United was the only club to (conveniently) claim substantial losses in 22/23 for COVID. Some other clubs did, but they were small, around 1 million each, iirc. UEFA didn't fall for it, but it seems the PL did. What a surprise.
United told Maguire the 22/23 losses included an amount for bad debts on sponsorship, which Everton tried to claim for following the Russia sanctions, but the PL disallowed them (Russia/COVID are two different things, after all). They also said the losses included the impact of TV rebates from UEFA/PL, but everyone else accounted for those in 21/22 apparently. Does smell a bit bullshitty, though.
The Glazer/Ratcliffe legal costs shouldn't really have been included in the accounts (it seems to me), but if they are I think they can be legitimately excluded as non-sporting expenses. Not sure it's in the rules, but makes sense. Common sense doesn't come into the equation with City, though.