If it all does pan out as this imbecile says, does he not realise his clubs CEO is also heading for Straneways?Ooops - this is in danger of becoming an alternative scum thread - and I recognise that I am contributing to that - so last one of this type.
I was reading their thread and was taken by this 'specialist'
Here's us thinking that we are well served by Slbsn and Prestwich Blue - but the rags seem to have someone to trump them in specialist knowledge..................
Fuck this guy seems such a ??????
- Yesterday at 18:39
Garnacho's Shoelaces
New Member
Newbie
Joined Nov 6, 2022Messages 941Location In Garnacho's boots but untied
Their guilt is an inevitability at this stage. City have invested huge resources into delay tactics rather than fighting the claims. The timeline was posted earlier in this thread but essentially the hearing could have been completed over 3 years ago.
Kicking the can down the road isn't the action of an entity believing they can defend their actions. Let's not forget this is a civil matter too. The EPL need to prove City probably broke their rules. They have to prove it is more likely, than not, the allegations occured.
Once proven, I suspect City are in for a decade of legal issues. There are the criminal issues. False accounting (Section 17 Theft Act 1968) seems nailed on for the high level executives. Concealing criminal property (Section 327 POCA 2000) which is effectively money laundering. Then you have the fact this is effectively a complex fraud (resists making a Fraudiola reference). City have repeatedly made false representations from which they gained, and others were exposed to a risk of loss (Section 2 Fraud Act 2006). The most appropriate primacy for the investigation is likely the National Crime Agency (NCA) and Serious Fraud Office (SFO). That'll take a few years to unpick I suspect, a few convictions coming out of that. Custody threshold definitely passed when considering the societal importance of sport and the reputational damage to one of our biggest global exports.
Then all the civil stuff will begin. Every time City have finished ahead of another team, they've cost each team ~£1m in finishing position prize money. Years they've won, that's £19m. Second, £18m, etc. 15 years of it going to be around £200m. Then you have teams being relegated because City were cheating to stay in the league. Then the teams losing out on Champions League, Europa League and Conference League football because of a cheating team finishing ahead. The sponsorship implications of those losses. City have probably cost other teams around £750-1bn in lost revenues, just on those factors alone.
In short, I'd expect a couple of decent prison sentences for the coordinators of the conspiracy to defraud and financial ruin for City but likely playing out until 2035.
Well I guess proper whopper covers it
But it does reflect just how many people are out there desperate for confirmation of our doom - they eat this shit up and regurgitate it
Bunch of cunts
I prefer "clear and obvious" ;)Indeed it did. Loud and clear.
it didIndeed it did. Loud and clear.
As for City ‘kicking the can down the road !’I seem to remember,and I stand to be corrected, that it was the premier league/cartel clubs ,that announced they was looking into these matters then waited over 4 years before hastily charging/accusing City of the 115 just before the government was to hear a bill about bringing an independent regulator in to football to run these matters ?Did the daft **** mention the £40m the cunts got for Covid that nobody else got? Did he mention the £35m bullshit allowance for share dealing costs? Both of which were invented to get them through PSR? Course he didn’t. Did he mention the cunts failing FFP? Course not
As for City ‘kicking the can down the road !’I seem to remember,and I stand to be corrected, that it was the premier league/cartel clubs ,that announced they was looking into these matters then waited over 4 years before hastily charging/accusing City of the 115 just before the government was to hear a bill about bringing an independent regulator in to football to run these matters ?
It was then Masters ,who is nothing more than a paid cartel clubs shill started stirring the pot in a feeble attempt to show the premier league had teeth and did not need regulation?
Make the odds look like there's a chance of relegation and droves of idiots chuck money at them.Just checked this years PL odds. City 7/5 and Arsenal 9/5 for the title, sounds right.
Relegation Arsenal 2000/1, city 12/1???!!!
I suppose we could take those odds as the chances of losing the 115 charges!
I’m at the stage where I think that the more gullible twats on that site will literally believe anything regarding this topic, given the utter desperation of some on there for us to be found guilty. So much so that I bet if a City fan signed up - masquerading as a United fan - and posted some utterly outrageous “info” that makes even Garnacho Shoelaces’ post look sensible then the daft cunts would swallow it hook, line, and sinker due to them being so far down the rabbit hole of conspiracy.Did the daft **** mention the £40m the cunts got for Covid that nobody else got? Did he mention the £35m bullshit allowance for share dealing costs? Both of which were invented to get them through PSR? Course he didn’t. Did he mention the cunts failing FFP? Course not
If the bookies were that confident of us being found guilty and therefore relegated the price would be nowhere near 12/1.Just checked this years PL odds. City 7/5 and Arsenal 9/5 for the title, sounds right.
Relegation Arsenal 2000/1, city 12/1???!!!
I suppose we could take those odds as the chances of losing the 115 charges!
If anyone thinks the bookies would pay out if we were relegated by the premier league they’re deluded, they’d use any loophole to not pay out.If the bookies were that confident of us being found guilty and therefore relegated the price would be nowhere near 12/1.
I wonder how many of the 'They're obviously guilty' brigade are putting a bet on it?