Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Or dippers?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
He feels like a County fan to me.Or dippers?
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,253
He waited over 12 months for it too.Great first post, mate. You’ll really brighten things up round here.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Confident of not being found out to be a dipper/rag/whatever? I think they've blown that one.To be fair I think the first part of his username indicates bullet proof clothing so maybe he feels confident?
They have to spend a couple of months in off topic to build up the post count first.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
He’s obviously thought long and hard about his first post.He waited over 12 months for it too.
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,375
I actually am not as optimistic as most people here. I think we'll got done for some but not all charges. And I'm not referring to non-cooperation. I find it incredibly unlikely that they've dragged this on for as long as they have, and without dropping any charges, to not have high confidence some things will stick.
Sound logic when you consider they've just lost an appeal because they brought charges against Leicester despite their rules clearly having a glaring omission which means they couldn't.
The sort of basic point that you would investigate prior to bringing charges. Which of course they did, and decided it would be a sound legal argument to claim that although the rules as written wouldn't bite Leicester, if you use your imagination they really should.
Sounds like a cockerney c#nt so can’t be a r…, oops my badI always enjoy a rag’s first post.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
You could also look at it the other way, especially the way Pep reacted with his Churchill ian speech after the EPL dropped the bombshell of the 115 allegations.I’ve posted before but whoever pushed and pursued the whole agenda against City ( I’m talking about an individual) not a group of clubs together,has done a fantastic job as it’s achieved in part to keep people thinking that we have cheated/are guilty when nothing has been proven and also aided by a complicit media,my one hope is that somehow when we are cleared that the club pursue’s damages against the cnuts that started this,that’s all I ask let’s see how they like it .expect the unexpected..
Had the media treated Pep as one of the cartel managers, he might have done his 3 years which most people expected & there wouldn't have been the treble, 4 in a row.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
2 messages in 12 months. Mmm.....I actually am not as optimistic as most people here. I think we'll got done for some but not all charges. And I'm not referring to non-cooperation. I find it incredibly unlikely that they've dragged this on for as long as they have, and without dropping any charges, to not have high confidence some things will stick.
Do you genuinely think If the premier league had us bang to rights then they'd have waited 4 years to destroy us after going to court with City to stop it becoming common knowledge
Elbow beards
Well-Known Member
It's took over a year to come out with that beauty.I yearn for the days where they’d bed in for a couple of months.