PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

State of this from the MUEN

It's actually from The Athletic but like all "articles" in the MEN it's just a couple of soundbites that can be read in multiple ways and then padded out with nonsense ramblings. It means absolutely nothing.
 
more than likely the pl dont seem to be bothered about embarrassing themselves.
Legacy of hubris.
Had everything their own way including appeals procedures.

Certainly the ones who pull their strings are not reliable PL members so is the penny about to drop with Mr M.?
 
i think he need medical help just full stop, him and alot of others have invested so much time and energy into their hatred of us regardless of what happens they are going to crash when the hearing is over regardless of how it goes, when we win they will nash their teeth and say its not fait, it was a swizz, it was a technicality etc etc but they will really have nowhere to go and nothing to do and have to find something or someone else to hate, if the worst happens they will say see i was right and once again have nowhere to go and nothing to do and have to find someone else to hate, its a looming crisis to them as they have nothing else to offer and that attention and potential revenue stream for all of them is about to go away really really fast and then what will they do?
A lot of people have made a lot of money from the anti-city narrative. But it is coming to an end and the circus will move on. We have probably reached the point.
 
I would say that it depends what it says in the emails. CAS stated that an email suggesting that we could do x, did not amount to proof that we actually did x.

But an email stating that we had done x might be seen in a different light.
Also, one of the three panel members DID think that the emails suggesting that we could do x, amounted to proof that we actually did x. This person was an experienced lawyer.
 
Also, one of the three panel members DID think that the emails suggesting that we could do x, amounted to proof that we actually did x. This person was an experienced lawyer.

You wouldn’t want that lawyer anywhere near a murder case. If an email arises where someone threatens to commit murder, that evidence convicts them even without evidence anyone has actually been murdered.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.