cant wait for the PL and media trying to slip Chelsea verdict under the carpet in the meantime. that is coming out sooner ideally than our verdict in the 115 case, wonder how media will portray that and the asterisks against any Chelsea trophies since Abra's time wrongdoings.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
No, it's actually the PL who do that, as do all the various national associations for their clubs.
Yep like the PL allowed 40m Covid money to the rags!
At the poodle parlour, getting the curls doneSurprised @tolmie's hairdoo is not playing. Has he got a brain injury?
Imagine if this things on live TV like in the USA? I wouldn't get any work done whatsoever.
Imagine this thread?
Well it's like that now but through X by the media rehashing everyday one way narrative for the next 6 weeks
BlueMonkey79
Well-Known Member
Jsut ask yourselves one question.
Would the club be spending millions on re developing the stadium if they had a whiff that we may be on dodgy ground.
Construction would have been the first thing that would have stopped. No way would the owner risk losing pointless millions, if he thought we were in danger of getting relegated, banned or whatever else is on the table.
Would the club be spending millions on re developing the stadium if they had a whiff that we may be on dodgy ground.
Construction would have been the first thing that would have stopped. No way would the owner risk losing pointless millions, if he thought we were in danger of getting relegated, banned or whatever else is on the table.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,013
I would imagine the failing to co-operate ones are going to be harder to get off. I would have thought that was either we have or we haven’t. Saying that, this is why we pay millions to these lawyers.His reputation is unlikely to take a hit. Each case is unique and it's never really as clear cut as win or lose. Simon Jordan says we lost the UEFA case with CAS remember! I would expect the calmness within City (based on the rumours) to be because Pannick has advised on each and every charge and its chance of success/failure. He'll have advised them on how to manage the process with the PL from day 1. He knows how to argue a point, which case law to rely upon, which words to use and all the tricks in the book which is why he costs so much.
The failure to cooperate is going to hit us. I can't see how it wouldn't. Similarly to CAS, you have to cooperate with a sporting body in order for it to carry out its duty. We'll have arguments around why we didn't, but I would expect us to get short shrift and be fined. Again, I'd anticipate Pannick has a fair amount of evidence to justify why we didn't cooperate and, if it gets to the sanction stage, why it should be a financial and not sporting penalty.
Being cleared of all charges is a 6-0 win over the rags.
Being cleared of all but the non-cooperation and getting a fine is a 6-1 win. You celebrate both the same!
Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
Miggles getting over excited. I think uber-cretin Piers Moron tried to make issue out of the same point in that shite anti-City expose he sneezed out last year, only for ex-Arsenal chairman David Dein to piss all over his chips by firmly declaring it ‘not a smoking gun!’What's all this about Jaber Mohamed paying 30 mill to city on behalf of etisalat? The Independent seem to think it's a big deal.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
Trial of the century?His reputation is unlikely to take a hit. Each case is unique and it's never really as clear cut as win or lose. Simon Jordan says we lost the UEFA case with CAS remember! I would expect the calmness within City (based on the rumours) to be because Pannick has advised on each and every charge and its chance of success/failure. He'll have advised them on how to manage the process with the PL from day 1. He knows how to argue a point, which case law to rely upon, which words to use and all the tricks in the book which is why he costs so much.
The failure to cooperate is going to hit us. I can't see how it wouldn't. Similarly to CAS, you have to cooperate with a sporting body in order for it to carry out its duty. We'll have arguments around why we didn't, but I would expect us to get short shrift and be fined. Again, I'd anticipate Pannick has a fair amount of evidence to justify why we didn't cooperate and, if it gets to the sanction stage, why it should be a financial and not sporting penalty.
Being cleared of all charges is a 6-0 win over the rags.
Being cleared of all but the non-cooperation and getting a fine is a 6-1 win. You celebrate both the same!
Ruination of a great club?
Irrefutable evidence?
Costs running into hundred of millions?
Titles stripped?
Mansour and Abu Dhabi name ruined?
Police banging at the door?
£5k per hour is not enough.
Fall out will have to hit him in some way?
In fairness? He didn’t look to bothered -:)
So Miguel is basing his whole doom and gloom outcome on a load of bollocks proved already to be a load of bollocks? But he's still not letting it go?Miggles getting over excited. I think uber-cretin Piers Moron tried to make issue out of the same point in that shite anti-City expose he sneezed out last year, only for ex-Arsenal chairman David Dein to piss all over his chips by firmly declaring it ‘not a smoking gun!’
That's SO unlike the dwarf ****.