Is this a serious question?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Inter Me Nan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 10,526
Aye, thought it was us that was 'rattled'!!!Stonesy absolutely bodied them. In their minds, they were sailing past Watford services with three points and the League in the bag when JS scored. It is another scar in their psyche and hence weeks of boiled piss.
horlock_was_super
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 3,611
- Location
- In complete despair at 93:19
- Team supported
- Manchester City F.C.
Can’t remember if it was Naked Video or Absolutely that had the sketch OHBC News every week.Remember it was always the queen's horses. Never UK state owned horses.
The News Reader used to get angrier and angrier every week at English entitlement.
One that has always stuck in my mind was when he totally lost it and claimed that Britain won the World Cup in 1966!
Funny as fuck.
Yep, Britain has a peculiar singular way of apportioning it’s descriptive nouns.
Can you imagine a scenario whare Kaldoon goes on record with the statement of "Irrefutable evidence" Where Pep says he would leave if lied to, Where we embark on building a hotel and stadium expansion.
And then the case comes around and we say "no defence".
It's all
It’s very unlikely to even work that way we have seen all there evidence and they have seen ours and we both seemed to have agreed on a 10 week hearing.
The chances are is this is due to both parties putting up substantial arguments.
BLUE THUNDER
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 502
Like the “substantial” one UEFA used at CASIt’s very unlikely to even work that way we have seen all there evidence and they have seen ours and we both seemed to have agreed on a 10 week hearing.
The chances are is this is due to both parties putting up substantial arguments.
Are people taking the piss? Is this real? Of course it is. So is the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, Santa, the Boogeyman (No scratch that. KC from the Sunshine Band is actually real.) Be very concerned lest the Giant from Jack and the Beanstalk will come for you...You’re on ignore for asking this.
Ffs.
leithblue
Well-Known Member
Can’t remember if it was Naked Video or Absolutely that had the sketch OHBC News every week.
The News Reader used to get angrier and angrier every week at English entitlement.
One that has always stuck in my mind was when he totally lost it and claimed that Britain won the World Cup in 1966!
Funny as fuck.
Yep, Britain has a peculiar singular way of apportioning it’s descriptive nouns.
It’s McGlashan in Absolutely - he’s a bit of a legend
Absolutely
They set the ball rolling with labour reforms in 2016 (?). It is now illegal to:Much ignorance continues to be talked about current socioeconomic conditions and trends in the UEA.
Many things have changed and improved most particularly in the construction industry.
Safety standards are higher than in the west, accommodation is appropriate and practical, and wages are good.
South Asians,Philippineos and other nationals have historically been economic blue collar migrants, as have Italians and Irish.
Dubai has over 180 nationalities as residents from all over the planet, including thousands of British and Americans.
To suggest that the UAE today is dangerously exploitative of migrants is wide of the mark & I'm happy to set the record straight.
- change the terms of employment before the migrant arrives to fulfil a contract.
- Retain an employee’s passport.
- Refuse to allow an employee to leave in accordance with their contract.
- Attempt to prevent an employee from legally obtaining his exit pass from the police.
Etc etc
Overtime still in need of reform as employers can still insist on extra hours being worked. Domestic servants were included in the follow-up act, but enforcement is weak.
Still some way to go.
Last edited:
bigA
Well-Known Member
Does Chuck Norris want woodchip.He’s friends with Jackie Chan
And what is Lord Pannick going to do for the next 10 weeks with no evidence to present?Can you imagine a scenario whare Kaldoon goes on record with the statement of "Irrefutable evidence" Where Pep says he would leave if lied to, Where we embark on building a hotel and stadium expansion.
And then the case comes around and we say "no defence".
It's all bollocks.
FFS Tarquins are very , very desperate.