PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Totally exclusive with no overlap sadly, according to those who know a lot more than me on here.
The nature of the charges do not overlap, but the implicit findings of specific malice toward City in previous rule design and enforcement do overlap, even if it is not in an official manner.

The PL have been shown to have intentionally disadvantaged City and advantaged other clubs, which will shade analysis of proceedings moving forward.

It is likely one of the reasons the PL delayed release of the Tribunal decision.
 
Last edited:
It is the same discriminatory approach to certain clubs which was laid bare during the arbitration that resulted in the decision to charge us with the "115" breaches.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.