PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules


I wonder what this means for the future of football.
And are the shareholders (Who unanimously voted for it) the PL the clubs?

They dont mention City btw. v strange
Probably means the qatari bidders have lost interest in the rags and the glazers don't want them buying another PL club.
 
@Moderating Team

I never, ever say this as this is a forum, but this Terraloon poster is taking libos and needs fucking right off.
EthicalPerfectBovine-size_restricted.gif
 
United 1 billion in debt, Chelsea's owner owning a second club. The hateful 8 should get their own houses in order before they come after us. I'm sure the Premier League and UEFA will investigate them as fully as they have city (sarc).
United's going down.
While a billion in the red.
A billion in the red......
 
Wages were down £20.4m to £77.3m, a decrease of 20.9% as Erik ten Hag's team are not in this season's Champions League.

No CL means 20% less wages? Sounds fishy when they had the Thursday night kickabout instead. And of course only Simon Stone could turn lack of CL income into a positive spin.
 
What do we think the rags "one off sponsorship credit, that they have chosen not to detail" is and for how much?

Saw this which I thought was interesting, because looking at the dates doesn't it relate to a previous year?

Screenshot_2023-03-30-20-18-25-80_0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb.jpg

Which would make this at least the second time they've had a "one-off sponsorship credit"... Not sure if it's any big deal, but seems odd.
 
Saw this which I thought was interesting, because looking at the dates doesn't it relate to a previous year?

View attachment 73560

Which would make this at least the second time they've had a "one-off sponsorship credit"... Not sure if it's any big deal, but seems odd.

Team Viewer reimbursement. Think they got an advance and now they are exiting as shirt sponsors.

Wages will also be down with Ronaldo leaving.
 
Team Viewer reimbursement. Think they got an advance and now they are exiting as shirt sponsors.

Wages will also be down with Ronaldo leaving.

Won’t be TeamViewer as it’s only up to 31st December - another sponsor has evidently paid up to leave their deal early.

For the ‘one off credit’ to be material enough to mention it must’ve been a decently large sponsor, so not surprising they don’t want to expand on it….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bez
Won’t be TeamViewer as it’s only up to 31st December - another sponsor has evidently paid up to leave their deal early.

For the ‘one off credit’ to be material enough to mention it must’ve been a decently large sponsor, so not surprising they don’t want to expand on it….
Take your pick, but it would be a large one.
IMG_6523.jpeg

Presumably must be in the accounts of the firm paying them… so shouldn’t be too hard to locate
 
Wages were down £20.4m to £77.3m, a decrease of 20.9% as Erik ten Hag's team are not in this season's Champions League.

No CL means 20% less wages? Sounds fishy when they had the Thursday night kickabout instead. And of course only Simon Stone could turn lack of CL income into a positive spin.
His verbal gymnastics are something else. He needs to look up the definition of ‘remains’. The debt doesn’t remain at nearly £1bn, it’s increased almost £500m, to nearly £1bn.
 
You have to hand it to the glazers.
Bought the rags using somebody else money
Creamed off a good living from it each year
Spent virtually nothing on fixtures and fittings. Lick off paint to make it look good.
Sell for a whopping profit
Makes Alan sugar look like an apprentice
And they are considered to be fit and proper owners
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top