chickaroon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Jan 2018
- Messages
- 1,352
We dint have to prove our innocence, they have to prove our guilt.There’s a difference between being innocent and proving your innocence, though.
We dint have to prove our innocence, they have to prove our guilt.There’s a difference between being innocent and proving your innocence, though.
Aren’t adults supposed to have 32 teeth in total, not per row?
Good god I thought that Thunderbirds were no longer on the telly ! She is defo a puppet !What a ****, put in her place and this is her hitting back, lame as fuck
No, City wanted to produce evidence to prove our innocence from that period but CAS didn't allow it because it was too far back and time barred. The media have made out that we only got away with it because it was time barred. This PL investigation doesn't have a time bar so City can produce the evidence to prove our innocence and this is what the club statement was referring to when it said that we can now get the opportunity to prove it.Was the time barred stuff serious breaches?
I was once told by a good barrister friend of mine “never confuse incompetence with strategy and tactics.” That could very easily be what is going on here. The number of times I have Faced well known and ostensibly very experienced legal professionals and thought “what are they trying to achieve with this strategy?” It seemed ridiculous and without good reason but was being run. It was just incompetence…I'm legit starting to think, given the coverage and narrative that has formed around "well connected" sources, that a good chunk of the premier league have bought into the "time barred technicalities" argument and that's all they're going with at this trial.
Who says the art of civil debate is dead.He’s check mated you there, mate ;-)
So we must have handed stuff over then ? I don’t think a quick scan of companies house quite cuts the mustard ?One thing I find strange is no-one has identified precisely as far as I am aware who were the people investigating City. Were they the lawyers or finance people from the PL or outside investigators. Have the lawyers of the PL who also the lawyers to Arsenal and provide counsel to Tottenham vetted the process. We at least knew who we were dealing with at UEFA but this process has been shrouded in secrecy
Probably the same cunts who were on VAR for the derby.One thing I find strange is no-one has identified precisely as far as I am aware who were the people investigating City. Were they the lawyers or finance people from the PL or outside investigators. Have the lawyers of the PL who also the lawyers to Arsenal and provide counsel to Tottenham vetted the process. We at least knew who we were dealing with at UEFA but this process has been shrouded in secrecy
Bent as fuck , like the non penalty on GrealishProbably the same cunts who were on VAR for the derby.