I think some of it just comes down to personal 'pride' to some extent. He puts himself out there as an 'expert', so he's desperate to be proven right, or what does his opinion become worth?
He picked his side a long time ago and everything that happens that goes against his opinion, and the feedback that he gets (some fair and reasoned, some I'm sure less polite) just gets him more and more defensive.
If he had any sense he'd start working his way back to the middle ground, before he totally loses the plot.
Ship's sailed.
City are now his primary focus, sports journalism is just the platform through which he can voice his thoughts.
Don't even want to think about what it'd do to his mental state if these charges against us are dropped.
If the charges are dropped it will be blamed on a backhander without any evidence at all and it won’t change anything.
We need a full hearing and a clear judgment based on the facts. If the judgment goes completely in our favour it’s difficult to imagine how he handles it.
What’s most likely is that the judgment will be in our favour for all the most important charges and we’ll be found guilty on a small number of minor procedural charges. That will be enough to keep the **** going.
When CAS decided in our favour, the 2 or 3 journalists who've made this their raison d'etre decided it was the problem. No concerns were raised before the hearing, but when it delivered the "wrong" verdict they tried to undermine it.
If every single decision at the PL hearing went our way, including the non-cooperation etc., the same journalists would just balme the PL.
They've seen the emails and they've decided it's proof of what they think has been going on, no matter how many court cases go against that narrative.