PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[wolviedinho]

 

[jonah62]

That’s fucking repulsive.

Ooh, I don’t know, Ritz in the 80’s, grab a granny, they’d suck you dry!

 

[cheekybids]

Shots fired…

 

[wolviedinho]

Shots fired…

Yea and not very subtle either. Dosent look like a club leader on his knees waiting for the fatal shot. If anything, he looks emboldened and determined to keep the club at the top.

This blue train ain’t stopping at platform 115. All aboard…

All the big wigs present at this award ceremony. I would loved to have been partial to the charges discussions.

Pep needs a new contract just to keep the piss boiling.

 

[jim tolmies perm]

Nice to see Amanda the Rag Davies choking on her words

 

[Chris in London]

Sorry if this question as been asked before.If City are cleared of all charges.Do the premier league have to cover the clubs legal costs?

Usually, yes, but the club is unlikely to recover all of them. Generally you would expect the successful party to recover 70-90% of what they actually spend.

 

[Blueroses]

Someone please explain to me how is this lobbying??? Read the request for
Minutes and do see the issue why media have right to get it? Wit current situation we have and our support for independent regulators known fact it’s bizarre tbh. If anyone can shed light apparently it’s cover up of 115 baffled.

 

[Coatigan]

Reporting In from spending way too much time on social media defending our club.
Todays theme from R&D fans-
City had two of the three man panel at CAS and that’s why we had the verdict overturned.
I asked for evidence and the reply was “there’s a report on it”
Oh f@ck - guilty as charged then and don’t get me started on time barred.

Well we'll just have to buy two of the PL panel as well then.

Just like we bought all our titles. Yawn.

 

[cheekybids]

Someone please explain to me how is this lobbying??? Read the request for
Minutes and do see the issue why media have right to get it? Wit current situation we have and our support for independent regulators known fact it’s bizarre tbh. If anyone can shed light apparently it’s cover up of 115 baffled.

Ask him if he’s got the minutes for Masters interview with Dipper & Rags.

 

[KS55]

The PL have made the massive claim around sponsors (as UEFA did) and the case is primarily about that. The IC will take a dim view of the PL not being able to make out that claim which will infect the rest.

An interesting and important point. In a bench trial, don‘t piss off the judge.
If the PL really don’t have a smoking gun, they will be on a sticky wicket ab
initio.