PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

If the sponsor themself is happy / willing to pay whatever the amount is, surely it follows that the sponsor sees it as “fair value”?
Yesterday, somebody paid £25k for the shirt Colin Firth wore in Price and Predjudice, is that " fair value " ? Most people would say no but the person who paid for it would disagree, "fair value" is subjective . The Premier League are making themselves a laughing stock
 
The thing is the biggest value exposure market I'd imagine now is America/UK, as the likes of India, Africa, China hasn't the disposable income so who has the big TV audience figures in the countries that matter?

I believe it's iccle City, nothing to see here regards us but a worry for Toon.
 
Yesterday, somebody paid £25k for the shirt Colin Firth wore in Price and Predjudice, is that " fair value " ? Most people would say no but the person who paid for it would disagree, "fair value" is subjective . The Premier League are making themselves a laughing stock
Or Antony bring valued at £80m but an unnamed club was prepared to spunk that amount on a crock of shite.

Yes, I’m being facetious.
 
Without the benefit of any personal legal training I have to say I have learnt more about the legal process by reading various BM threads.

We certainly value your legal opinions as well as your other opinions on none football threads.
Keep posting Gorden (as if you needed any encouragement).
Jeez - can almost picture his little face reading that.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.