eastlandsblue
Well-Known Member
Then that defeats the object of selling established players like Gallagher and James in Chelsea’s situation
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
As I understand it, and someone will possibly have more knowledge on this, as an example a team like say Newcastle who’s turnover was about 250m it helps them as if the TV revenues of the bottom club is 100m and it’s x 5 that means potentially Newcastle have up to 250m whereby sale of players would be an advantage.Then that defeats the object of selling established players like Gallagher and James in Chelsea’s situation
In our case our turnover is 700m plus but we’re restricted to 500m so any player profits are irrelevant.
Chelsea will need to sell to balance this years PSR rules, the changes won’t affect the end of season sales.
eastlandsblue
Well-Known Member
Surely player sales will reduce the wage bill. If rumours of City being after both Guimaraes and Paqueta then they’ll have to reduce that billAs I understand it, and someone will possibly have more knowledge on this, as an example a team like say Newcastle who’s turnover was about 250m it helps them as if the TV revenues of the bottom club is 100m and it’s x 5 that means potentially Newcastle have up to 250m whereby sale of players would be an advantage.
In our case our turnover is 700m plus but we’re restricted to 500m so any player profits are irrelevant.
Chelsea will need to sell to balance this years PSR rules, the changes won’t affect the end of season sales.
Sir Joe Aguero
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 3,153
It’s such a stupid rule, all it does is push the price up for average players, does nothing to stop clubs getting in silly debt and stops any competition in the championship.As I understand it, and someone will possibly have more knowledge on this, as an example a team like say Newcastle who’s turnover was about 250m it helps them as if the TV revenues of the bottom club is 100m and it’s x 5 that means potentially Newcastle have up to 250m whereby sale of players would be an advantage.
In our case our turnover is 700m plus but we’re restricted to 500m so any player profits are irrelevant.
Chelsea will need to sell to balance this years PSR rules, the changes won’t affect the end of season sales.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Surely player sales will reduce the wage bill. If rumours of City being after both Guimaraes and Paqueta then they’ll have to reduce that bill
That’s probably the bit they haven’t thought about is what the players and PFA will make of it as this will result in wages reducing if so. There will be a legal challenge from that aspect, it’s another shit idea from the Premier league with a lot of holes in it that will unravel like the current rules are when it’s worked in real world scenarios they haven’t accounted for.
Yes of course, it reduces the wage bill but generally each team has a squad of 25 senior players so if Newcastle sold those two they’d have to replace them or operate with a weakened numerical squad.Surely player sales will reduce the wage bill. If rumours of City being after both Guimaraes and Paqueta then they’ll have to reduce that bill
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Wages taken into account?
Great if like 95% of teams you can plan a year ahead with no worries about trophy bonus payments but....well you all know the rest.
Great if like 95% of teams you can plan a year ahead with no worries about trophy bonus payments but....well you all know the rest.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,218
Imagine teams having to throw cup finals to adhere to PSR!Wages taken into account?
Great if like 95% of teams you can plan a year ahead with no worries about trophy bonus payments but....well you all know the rest.
Last edited:
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Yeah that's where I was heading.Imagine teams having to throw cup finals to adhere to FSP!
I'm hoping that this early vote is 'in principal' and when there's some meat on the bones enough owners outside the American cartel ones can see it for what it is.
Cheers. Suspect I will go on in the future. But we’ll seeYou had him on the run @projectriver :-).
He didn’t have answers to your points and could only try shouting over you. Kieran didn’t have a point to prove re City so he’s a safer option