PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Metal Biker said:
787084ee-9882-43fc-8954-33d8979ab349_text.gif
Click to expand...

Something usually posted by people out of their depth.
 
Coatigan said:
How do you not see that that doesn't 'confirm' anything. It is a flippant joke. COULD be hiding an admission. Could also be laughing off a current rumour. Open to individual speculation, but doesn't confirm anything.

The second guy's reaction is telling too, when he says something like 'can't talk about it, but we just did 4 podcasts on it'. Either way, fine to speculate, wrong to run away with as confirmation or proof.

Same as the simon stone line btw, which I myself previously used to speculate he received a letter. Hints at it, doesn't confirm it.
Click to expand...

But Goldbridge says ‘I’ll have the letter for you on Tuesday’
 
Coatigan said:
How do you not see that that doesn't 'confirm' anything. It is a flippant joke. COULD be hiding an admission. Could also be laughing off a current rumour. Open to individual speculation, but doesn't confirm anything.

The second guy's reaction is telling too, when he says something like 'can't talk about it, but we just did 4 podcasts on it'. Either way, fine to speculate, wrong to run away with as confirmation or proof.

Same as the simon stone line btw, which I myself previously used to speculate he received a letter. Hints at it, doesn't confirm it.
Click to expand...
You seem to have missed mate that he has now clarified he has received a letter and will show it tomorrow.
 
vincent said:
But Goldbridge says ‘I’ll have the letter for you on Tuesday’
Click to expand...

Where does he say that, sorry. Genuinely haven't seen it and asking because I want to, not because I doubt it. Seen someone else claim this as below btw, which has me interested.

Mcfc1.9.8.0 said:
Hasn’t he just put another video out saying he got one and he will show it on his podcast on Tuesday
Click to expand...

For the record, I do want it to be true and confirmed and clearly true an all that, really. Just because I am arguing speculation vs proof, does not mean I don't believe it or want to. As I keep pointing out with my own Simon Stone assumption.

That there though would then be the confirmation everyone wantst to see, that hopefully put it beyond debate.
 
bluemanchester said:
I thought the Wolves player put Guardiol off his shot at the time, which if it happened anywhere else on the pitch would be a foul, and a booking if the player wore sky blue. I will look at it again sometime. Now lets have a discussion whether the push on Ake just before half time should have been a penalty. I thought it should and expected the ref to start the second half with a penalty to us, like united that time. Some fecking hope;-)
Click to expand...
Wolves idiots sarcastically singing "was that a penalty"? for the shove on Ake, I was thinking yes of course it was, was he not taken out mid-air? Not seen it again yet, needless to say motd didn't even show it, never mind discuss it, preferring to cast doubt on the first pen which I think was valid pen as he made contact just after the ball had gone, making it a foul anywhere.
ps. I replied but not sure why this is in this thread..?
 
I'm no cynic but... said:
Not acceptable. Didn't UEFA President Ceferin recently say that City got away with it at CAS and that everyone knows it. That's what you get when we accept a 'pinch' and we have to make sure that these accusers never have even the slightest bit of ammunition to fire at us again. Put it to bed once and for all.
Click to expand...

I am in agreement with you, but we aren't going to come out of this unblemished.

I dont think the club will have an issue with the none co-operation angle as long as it is clear that once the information was supplied there was absolutely no guilt on our part.
 
Academica said:
Will wait for Tuesday then when he will probably say something like he as been advised not to show the letter. The guy is just full of shit. I really hope he as received a letter but have my doubts.
Click to expand...
Tbf even saying he has been advised to not show one would be as strong an indication he has got one as you can get.
He is definitely milking it either way.
 
Last edited:
Elliot houghton said:
Can’t see why City would send him one he’s just a YouTuber not really someone I can see us going at more likely he’s going to pretend he has one for attention and views
Click to expand...
He's a youtuber with nearly 2 million subscribers. He's probably got more reach than a tabloid journalist.
 
Coatigan said:
Where does he say that, sorry. Genuinely haven't seen it and asking because I want to, not because I doubt it. Seen someone else claim this as below btw, which has me interested.



For the record, I do want it to be true and confirmed and clearly true an all that, really. Just because I am arguing speculation vs proof, does not mean I don't believe it or want to. As I keep pointing out with my own Simon Stone assumption.

That there though would then be the confirmation everyone wantst to see, that hopefully put it beyond debate.
Click to expand...
To be fair that idiot could be just trying to get a load of traffic on his channel on Tuesday may just show some letter a kid wrote and make a big joke out of it. Who knows ?

I’m just glad we are getting some positive stories or leaks after the 15 months of mud being thrown at us
 
ganganvince said:
Click to expand...


Ok the subsequent video (the first of the two in your post) wasn't showing up for me, it just looked like the same one (the bottom one) twice. There IS more in that than I had been going with, and more than in the earlier video of the 'laughter'. Thanks. It has moved on since yesterday and that does now look far more substantial.
 
Was away over the weekend and saw a red i know. Decent enough bloke, good job, seemingly a sensible man

Told him of the rumours that charges have been dropped, told him what the city lawyer told me. His reply …

“Well youve obviously bribed someone”.

I laughed as i thought he was joking but no, he was deadly serious. I asked what he means and he said , “youve bribed the FA”.

The FA? What we have drove to london with a bag of cash to bribe ‘The FA’. Couldnt be arsed going into it as regards what the fuck the FA have to do with all this, nor how he thinks the bribe went down.

He then said “if you get away with it then forest and everton should sue”

Thats what we are up against. Idiots
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top