Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Exactly, there's no way we'd have gone ahead with that development if we knew we were getting the book thrown at usAnd then set off on a £300m expansion / improvement of the Etihad campus
Exactly, there's no way we'd have gone ahead with that development if we knew we were getting the book thrown at usAnd then set off on a £300m expansion / improvement of the Etihad campus
They didn’t hire the very best in IT because we got hacked and that’s what got us here in the first place.Whenever you have a moment of doubt just tell yourself this, since our owners came they have hired the best in every area to carry out their plan and brought about a team the likes of which the pl has never seen before and they did all that with a cartel trying every dirty trick in the book to try and stop them, why would they not do exactly what theyve done all along now.
If you want even further clarification our owners can point to 12 years of success for evidence of our owners keeping their word, the pl can point to richard masters a man with so little self respect he took a job that 4 much better qualified candidates publicly rejected.
Yip same as when it came to us with the UEFA/CAS hearing the media had uefa as an upstanding organisation,compare that when the red scousers were looking compensation from UEFA over the champions league final the media portrayed UEFA as a corrupt and dishonest organisation..Has any sports team. Organisation. Country! Ever received as much one sided negative media coverage as this? Had nothing but giddy texts off rags today convinced were toast. The media have whipped them into a frenzy!
You really are a glutton for punishment, lol...We've got weeks of it as well.
Think it might be better watching the lefties and righties arguing on the politics thread until the verdict comes in
CAS were arbritating over Uefas charges against us and possible champions league ban, this hearing is for the Premier leagues accusations.Where I'm a bit confused is how anything that was already adjudicated in our favor at CAS, which is the highest court in Europe regarding matters of sport, can be presented again. How is this not considered double jeopardy or does that not exist in the UK? If that's the case I apologize in advance for not knowing this...
No idea what would or wouldn't be our defence, but worth noting we are not charged with non-cooperation for the years investigated. We are charged for the years not investigated. We have presumably cooperated with the investigation.As it happens a) I don't think that will work b) won't be our defence. I suspect they will say they did disclose and cooperate fully and hope that they if they have won on the substantive charges, the Panel will be onside. If they have lost on the substantive, it will be largely irrelevant (albeit an aggravating factor potentially)