PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[bigA]

Given we supplied the entire email chains to UEFA/CAS I'd guess not.

Fair point. Maybe I've misinterpreted ayrshire blue's post.

 

[bigA]

This reads like the one of the many ready made excuses that the majority of those who have already found us guilty will come up with if or when we are cleared. But I bet Mr. Dumb bar....sorry Dunbar will claim his club is squeaky clean.

 

[chaddblue]

View attachment 139004
This reads like the one of the many ready made excuses that the majority of those who have already found us guilty will come up with if or when we are cleared. But I bet Mr. Dumb bar....sorry Dunbar will claim his club is squeaky clean.

Funny how bellends like this have decided that the completely neutral and super professional CAS was "dodgy"... but UEFA, who actually are and always have been dodgy as fuck, got the inital investigation spot on

 

[KS55]

Funny how bellends like this have decided that the completely neutral and super professional CAS was "dodgy"... but UEFA, who actually are and always have been dodgy as fuck, got the inital investigation spot on

Yes, that’s why UEFA dispensed with Leterme's services and completely changed their processes. Leterme was too upright and their investigatory system too fair.

 

[thismeansfour]

View attachment 139004
This reads like the one of the many ready made excuses that the majority of those who have already found us guilty will come up with if or when we are cleared. But I bet Mr. Dumb bar....sorry Dunbar will claim his club is squeaky clean.

You can't argue with stupid. As pointed out, organisations with history of dodginess can't possibly be the issue here, the independent sporting court of law with no agenda is dodgy I am telling you!

 

[Elbow beards]

Funny how bellends like this have decided that the completely neutral and super professional CAS was "dodgy"... but UEFA, who actually are and always have been dodgy as fuck, got the inital investigation spot on

The same people that say the Premier League are corrupt but are squeeky clean when it comes to going after us and when we're found not guilty, will cry that they are in cahoots with us even though it's cost 'em a fortune trying to do us.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

You can't argue with stupid. As pointed out, organisations with history of dodginess can't possibly be the issue here, the independent sporting court of law with no agenda is dodgy I am telling you!

Well if there are any sympathies / loyalties with the PL amongst them, there might always be that potential risk.

Masters hasn't really demonstrated a huge degree of integrity during his time in office and may be desperately trying to stay in office. Desperation could be a driver.

Hopefully , and not before time imo, the official findings/ statements/ judgements will come out and sink all the plans and machinations of the cartel.

 

[Prophet of Doom]

If you're referring to POD's post it'd be helpful to read it again. It hasn't been suggested that HRH would run a mile from the club afaik?

How do I know what? That SM distancing himself from the case if he thought things were going bad isn't even an option? What are you smoking friend?

Also, PofD claimed that Tolmie's posts indicate that TH doesn't understand the PSR rules when in fact it's the complete opposite. Tolmie suggested we did not go the shareholder loan route because we may have been prescient enough to foresee these loans eventually having to be included in the calculations of a club's PSR. Personally, I think that's a bit of a stretch but it's 100% NOT an indication of Tolmie not knowing what he's talking about in terms of PSR. Quite the opposite.

PofD has some sort of Schleprock shtick going, I get it, but really he's just a cartoon version of the Grim Reaper...

what an absolute crock o shit.

Firstly, I never said SM would run a mile from City - IF and it’s a big IF if we go down in flames at the 115 tribunal I would guarantee you that SM wont be taking the ultimate rap for it. Others might - but it won’t be SM.

As for your defence of Tolmie - he literally tweeted ‘why would city inflate sponsorship when billonaire owners can finance spending’ which is complete bollocks and misunderstand of PSR.

He dug in himself in deeper with ridiculous further posts saying the same.

I normally like Tolmies posts on Twitter - but todays thread was nonsense

 

[eastmanc]

Isn't it strange how he interprets the entirely independent and impartial CAS hearing as 'dodgy' but sees no problem with UEFA, an organisation with a long track record of corruption. Could it be because that simply wouldn't fit the narrative?

In the of Henry the janitor, "could be".:-)

 

[mexico1970]