Didn’t we all? (Kaz excepted).
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Who cares anymore ? fuck the lot of them and their silly rules that United and Liverpool made up to protect football
I waved the white flag when the PSR rules were waved When the scum United Fudged £75 million in allowances.
Nobody blinked an eye or questioned United, When news broke on Talksport with Stefan Borson breaking it down and saying £45million was for Covid19 allowances and £30 million for legal fees for the sale of shares to Jim.
Manchester City can never win because we are guilty by media and social media, A Not Guilty Verdict would mean fuck all and meaningless because the goalpost will be moved again and again.
I waved the white flag when the PSR rules were waved When the scum United Fudged £75 million in allowances.
Nobody blinked an eye or questioned United, When news broke on Talksport with Stefan Borson breaking it down and saying £45million was for Covid19 allowances and £30 million for legal fees for the sale of shares to Jim.
Manchester City can never win because we are guilty by media and social media, A Not Guilty Verdict would mean fuck all and meaningless because the goalpost will be moved again and again.
Blueknows
Well-Known Member
Fuck em...we know who the cheating bastards really areWho cares anymore ? fuck the lot of them and their silly rules that United and Liverpool made up to protect football
I waved the white flag when the PSR rules were waved When the scum United Fudged £75 million in allowances.
Nobody blinked an eye or questioned United, When news broke on Talksport with Stefan Borson breaking it down and saying £45million was for Covid19 allowances and £30 million for legal fees for the sale of shares to Jim.
Manchester City can never win because we are guilty by media and social media, A Not Guilty Verdict would mean fuck all and meaningless because the goalpost will be moved again and again.
Superace
Well-Known Member
Alan Brazil didn't say City were going to get done in January, he said he'd heard there would be a decision in January but then appeals would drag it on.We had a Talksport presenter the other week saying he'd heard that we'd got off with all charges. Almost like they're covering all bases. Not sure Alan Brazil's opinion really merits so much discussion (and yes I'm conscious that I've just added to it)!
So United can do any figure they want for anything ? Why have they not been challenged ? I don’t think the rules need changing for Chelsea the sale is clearly not fair market value shirt or hotelThe clubs had the opportunity to change the rules reassert sale but choose not to.
Because of US rules Utds holding company had to quantify and publish the sum they believe in terms of losses was attributed to COVID but it’s almost 100% certain that the sum allowed for PSR wasn’t the same number as shown in the holding company’s accounts
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,727
Somebody posted the link on here after the event in the talksport threadI remember both of them mate.
That Irani one was piss funny.
Don't suppose they are still out there to listen again are they?
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,727
Its mad how much more relaxed I am now Colin. With age comes reflectionLOL. I remember being asked to go on Jimmy Waggs's pre-match show one time while driving to the gane. I stopped my car near the Marble Arch waiting to go on, and I could hear the previous caller having a good rant. His name was Alex if I remember. ;-)
My understanding re Utd was that the figure shown in the accounts in terms of Covid losses wasn’t the sum that appeared in their PSR submissions. There often is a disparity between accounts and PSR.So United can do any figure they want for anything ? Why have they not been challenged ? I don’t think the rules need changing for Chelsea the sale is clearly not fair market value shirt or hotel
PSR restrictions for instance in the areas of transfer fee amortisation isn’t in accord with standard accounting practice.
Having said all that how do you know that Utd haven’t been challenged re their PSR submission?
As for the sum Chelsea FC “ sold” the two hotels to BlueCo land values in the Kings Road area significant and it ain’t cheap to stay there . Chelsea Harbour Hotel which ain’t a million miles away sold for £63 million in 2013
journolud
Well-Known Member
Fucking hell, that’s some exclusiveAlan Brazil didn't say City were going to get done in January, he said he'd heard there would be a decision in January but then appeals would drag it on.