PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Don’t know if mentioned already, apologies if it has, but Lord Pannick replied to Karen Brady (and others) in the House of Lords, during debate about the Football governance bill:

1734173061331.png

…

1734173138623.png

…

1734173295275.png

…

1734173368997.png

I’ve only included Lord Pannick’s contributions, as he is relevant to City by association. Just from scanning the pages (and pages, and pages) of the debate, Lord Pannick comes across as succinct and to the point, compared to the waffling of others.

Someone to avoid is Lord Rainow who shoehorned into the debate about being a United season ticket holder and biggest crowd, longest waiting list blah blah blah
 
JASR said:
Don’t know if mentioned already, apologies if it has, but Lord Pannick replied to Karen Brady (and others) in the House of Lords, during debate about the Football governance bill:

View attachment 140531

…

View attachment 140532

…

View attachment 140534

…

View attachment 140535

I’ve only included Lord Pannick’s contributions, as he is relevant to City by association. Just from scanning the pages (and pages, and pages) of the debate, Lord Pannick comes across as succinct and to the point, compared to the waffling of others.

Someone to avoid is Lord Rainow who shoehorned into the debate about being a United season ticket holder and biggest crowd, longest waiting list blah blah blah
Click to expand...

"The problem is that those rules are made by the 20 premier league clubs themselves".

He knows.
 
JASR said:
Don’t know if mentioned already, apologies if it has, but Lord Pannick replied to Karen Brady (and others) in the House of Lords, during debate about the Football governance bill:

View attachment 140531

…

View attachment 140532

…

View attachment 140534

…

View attachment 140535

I’ve only included Lord Pannick’s contributions, as he is relevant to City by association. Just from scanning the pages (and pages, and pages) of the debate, Lord Pannick comes across as succinct and to the point, compared to the waffling of others.

Someone to avoid is Lord Rainow who shoehorned into the debate about being a United season ticket holder and biggest crowd, longest waiting list blah blah blah
Click to expand...
Maybe Lord Rainow, being a rag season ticket holder, should change his title to a more appropriate Lord Rainedon
 
JASR said:
Don’t know if mentioned already, apologies if it has, but Lord Pannick replied to Karen Brady (and others) in the House of Lords, during debate about the Football governance bill:

View attachment 140531

…

View attachment 140532

…

View attachment 140534

…

View attachment 140535

I’ve only included Lord Pannick’s contributions, as he is relevant to City by association. Just from scanning the pages (and pages, and pages) of the debate, Lord Pannick comes across as succinct and to the point, compared to the waffling of others.

Someone to avoid is Lord Rainow who shoehorned into the debate about being a United season ticket holder and biggest crowd, longest waiting list blah blah blah
Click to expand...

So Lord Rainow is just a typical rag " supporting " **** who believes that they are something which they clearly are not.

Without the braindead lemmings keeping them afloat they would cease to exist as a force in football terms.

So the thickest and most fickle cunts in the world remain responsible for them infesting the real world.

Thanks to the honourable Lord, as yet another who has been a good turn, but clearly on too long !

Cunts all of them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.