What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.But you have continued to reference him, even though it has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions that following disclosure he has no relevance. You've been like a fucking broken record.
Merry Christmas
Fuck me, if the premier league got it off him before disclosure then surely they were duty bound to share it with City and their legal team during disclosure. Surely disclosure is not a a one way street. If it is a way one street it makes refuting the allegations so much harder as even our legal team are not playing with a full deck.What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.
Merry Christmas
But City do know, and there is no suggestion that their attitude of quiet confidence has changed in any way. The reverse, if anything.What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.
Merry Christmas
Well, logical conclusions mixed with wishful thinking.
Doubling down now - a Moon rollI have never said that Pinto was relevant following disclosure. The additional 14TB of hacked data has been available years before the disclosure.
Of course, I’ve never written anything else. City knows, but we who are discussing here have no idea what evidence the Premier League has presented, apart from what comes from Der Spiegel.Fuck me, if the premier league got it off him before disclosure then surely they were duty bound to share it with City and their legal team during disclosure. Surely disclosure is not a a one way street.
Your claims are dying the death of a thousand qualifications.Of course, I’ve never written anything else. City knows, but we who are discussing here have no idea what evidence the Premier League has presented, apart from what comes from Der Spiegel.
But the club are still not showing any signs of concern. I give up as you obviously want to labour what I think is a moot pointOf course, I’ve never written anything else. City knows, but we who are discussing here have no idea what evidence the Premier League has presented, apart from what comes from Der Spiegel.
It’s been said before a million times. The Premier League has proven itself not to be MI5. If they had evidence it would be leaked. It hasn’t been leaked. The slam dunk smoking gun doesn’t exist. If it did we’d know. The Premier League, their acolytes in the clubs and media leak like a fucking sieve when it’s “good” news.What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.
Merry Christmas
Let's hope so.It’s been said before a million times. The Premier League has proven itself not to be MI5. If they had evidence it would be leaked. It hasn’t been leaked. The slam dunk smoking gun doesn’t exist. If it did we’d know. The Premier League, their acolytes in the clubs and media leak like a fucking sieve when it’s “good” news.
No one is biting. Why are you here? Take your face for a shit.
My point is that we don't know what evidence the Premier League has. Still alive and kicking.Your claims are dying the death of a thousand qualifications.
You don’t hope so.Let's hope so.
Exactly, if we're innocent we have nothing to fear.But the club are still not showing any signs of concern. I give up as you obviously want to labour what I think is a moot point
Unfortunately, plenty are, and it's killing the thread. Round and round in circles with the same person labouring the same irrelevant point.It’s been said before a million times. The Premier League has proven itself not to be MI5. If they had evidence it would be leaked. It hasn’t been leaked. The slam dunk smoking gun doesn’t exist. If it did we’d know. The Premier League, their acolytes in the clubs and media leak like a fucking sieve when it’s “good” news.
No one is biting. Why are you here? Take your face for a shit.
Nothing would give me more satisfaction than for us to win this case.You don’t hope so.
Did Khaldoon not come out after disclosure with his body of irrefutable evidence remark? Is so, that means he has seen any new evidence above the CAS evidence, from whatever sources and thinks its a load of bollocks.What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.
Merry Christmas
Hopefully.Did Khaldoon not come out after disclosure with his body of irrefutable evidence remark? Is so, that means he has seen any new evidence above the CAS evidence, from whatever sources and thinks its a load of bollocks.
You really are the Dark Side of the Moon! Bet you can’t wait to come on here and say “I told you”.Hopefully.
Us being?Nothing would give me more satisfaction than for us to win this case.
Why would I do that?You really are the Dark Side of the Moon! Bet you can’t wait to come on here and say “I told you”.
You’re not a blue but if you are you need to give your head a wobble.