PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.

I still don’t understand who pays these fucking nonse websites to advertise a product on a story written by a fukwit.

It’s not as if you click on it to see if City are getting dry bummed but within moments you’ve been hypnotised by a Dewalt Nail Gun & before you can say 115 you’ve bought the fucker.
 
This line is telling
"They have also been told United are "tight" when it comes to their PSR position.
The detail of that - as with all clubs - is vague"
Why should it be vague? Why isn't it clear and transparent for all to see? Well we all know the answer to that, don't we.
The PSR submission from each club should be published.
 
Id like to see the rags , what is it 270m losses ? when the limit is 105 over 3 years , hidden in plain sight ffs
Something as simple as a table of each club that states the last 3 year losses and then listing allowances granted, eg womens team, covid etc. At least that would allow for some comparison
 
Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.
Whatever next, “Third Lanark fc anxiously awaits the outcome of Man City’s historical FFP charges case”
 
Something as simple as a table of each club that states the last 3 year losses and then listing allowances granted, eg womens team, covid etc. At least that would allow for some comparison

I suspect that this is the last thing that the PL would want to release as currently they are able to conceal any issues which their favoured clubs may be experiencing, before "producing solutions " to make the problems go away.

The cabal members certainly don't want transparency regarding their operations.
 
Last edited:
I am a rookie but how can it be public news that they have lost 270m in that three year period, but no explanation as to why they haven't been punished or what their "allowances" are to then make them compliant?

How isn't this highlighted anywhere? How can this information not be disclosed?

You would think that our thoroughly professional and investigative media hounds would be all over this :)
 
I am a rookie but how can it be public news that they have lost 270m in that three year period, but no explanation as to why they haven't been punished or what their "allowances" are to then make them compliant?

How isn't this highlighted anywhere? How can this information not be disclosed?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top