gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.
Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.
Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.
Especially that cheating City…oh.Something doesn't sit right about no clubs failing. I can't believe this
The PSR submission from each club should be published.This line is telling
"They have also been told United are "tight" when it comes to their PSR position.
The detail of that - as with all clubs - is vague"
Why should it be vague? Why isn't it clear and transparent for all to see? Well we all know the answer to that, don't we.
Wake up, wake up, wake up it’s the first of tha month.Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.
It’s not as if you click on it to see if City are getting dry bummed but within moments you’ve been hypnotised by a Thai lady boy & before you can say 115 you’ve bought the fucker.
There was an identical one the other day with Middlesbrough being the benefactor. It's bonkers.
Definitely! Come on get them all made public and let’s have a look if they’re all squeaky clean what have they got to hide? Won’t hold my breathThe PSR submission from each club should be published.
Id like to see the rags , what is it 270m losses ? when the limit is 105 over 3 years , hidden in plain sight ffsThe PSR submission from each club should be published.
Something as simple as a table of each club that states the last 3 year losses and then listing allowances granted, eg womens team, covid etc. At least that would allow for some comparisonId like to see the rags , what is it 270m losses ? when the limit is 105 over 3 years , hidden in plain sight ffs
Not this time as PSG have similar looking owners to usAre you refering to RACISM against very successful brown people who've ecliped the red yank cabal in every aspect of sporting enterprise for over 10 years......or wot ??
170 million for mouse traps and log flume maintenance.Id like to see the rags , what is it 270m losses ? when the limit is 105 over 3 years , hidden in plain sight ffs
Whatever next, “Third Lanark fc anxiously awaits the outcome of Man City’s historical FFP charges case”Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.
Something as simple as a table of each club that states the last 3 year losses and then listing allowances granted, eg womens team, covid etc. At least that would allow for some comparison
I am a rookie but how can it be public news that they have lost 270m in that three year period, but no explanation as to why they haven't been punished or what their "allowances" are to then make them compliant?
How isn't this highlighted anywhere? How can this information not be disclosed?
I am a rookie but how can it be public news that they have lost 270m in that three year period, but no explanation as to why they haven't been punished or what their "allowances" are to then make them compliant?
How isn't this highlighted anywhere? How can this information not be disclosed?