PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Monkchester said:
Any ideas why this is on Manchester Evening News website today

Have your say on the result of Man City's charges​

Is the punishment given to Man City fair?
Yes
No
Unsure
Your responses may be used anonymously in print, online or on the social pages for brands owned and published by Reach Plc

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

City have a forgotten weapon to unleash in Champions League challenge

Oscar Bobb played an hour for Manchester City's Under-21s at the weekend as he closes in on a first team return
www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
Click to expand...
Club should kick in here tbh.
 
Bantamgaz said:
This it was to get the rest of the world believing that you where cheats and ince found not guilty i hope City take actions against the folk who tried to put it out there especially that spitting scouse rat
Click to expand...
agree with that, the cartel and it's media puppets should be subject to the same level of scrutiny as City are. Fat chance...the corruption is too widespread, the sums involved too vast. Even the sacrificial lamb(s) will walk away richly rewarded...modern life hey.
 
BobKowalski said:
Holt seems to written this piece through a veil of tears, it’s a plague on everyone’s house. He quotes :

‘Whoever “wins”,’ a Premier League chief executive told me on Monday, ‘it is the ultimate worthless victory. There can be no winners. There are only losers both ways.

Clarity is what everyone craves. And stability. But there is a widespread recognition that if we are not careful, we are going to kill the golden goose. We are on the edge of a precipice here.’

Well, yes, but you drove yourselves to this cliff edge while being cheered on by the press who are now lamenting a potential City victory in the 115 case - which was always a strong possibility given the outcome of the CAS hearing.

When this verdict is finally released in City’s favour I want pain. Lots of pain. I want casualties, I want vengeance on the people who foisted this stupidity on themselves and us fans. The fans are owed their pound of flesh and not just a pound, I want the whole stinking fucking carcass.
Click to expand...
A man after my own heart Bob, that is the way I have felt since that day in February 23. I am gonna stick it to them at every opportunity, If I find some rag, dipper, Mard arsenal or Spurs fan on the edge of a mental precipice because they didnt get the result they wanted, I will gleefully finger prod them into the abyss. I would sleep like a baby. I feel gutteral hatred for them all.
 
Metalartin said:
Oh, so Simon Cliff thinks he runs English football(for pointing out some proposed rules were unlawful and being proved correct), is that Oliver Holt's bullshit narrative now? How petulant.

Nothing to say about the owners of American cartel clubs? The ones who actually initiated the PL push for the ESL, which he mentioned. Project Big Picture before that, which he and his cronies treated very softly and it very rarely ever gets brought up by any of them(chances of that, if it was an owner from the middle east?). Nothing said about the influence they seem to have over the PL CEO, who was plucked from a list of candidates vetted by just two clubs, Liverpool and United.

Rick Parry and David Gill's names popping up in all the wrong places but nothing to see, according to our balanced, agenda free sports press.

None of the problems in English football are anything to do with the old big sly 3 of course. They've never created any wealth gaps or bullied the PL into creating rules that protect any monopolies that they never gained in the 90s to early 00s. Rules which have damaged the English game more than they've helped, according to many neutrals now.

There's no way that fraud believes his own narrative there IMO, seems way too calculated in what he's chosen to ignore to push it.
Click to expand...
When we truthfully say that a potential head of the PL has to be vetted by Liverpool and United before getting the position, we are forgetting that it was probably Arsenal that put their name forward in the first place.
 
Manc123 said:
some of the charges relate to non cooperation i expect were likley be cleared on the most serious of the charges but get some sort of fine for the non cooperation charges.
Click to expand...
As long as the non cooperation charges did not cover things that made us guilty of their charges we can take the moral high ground about leaks and sensitive non relevant commercial info..
 
bluenova said:
The article says that whatever the outcome, "nobody wins". It mentions quite a lot about how the big clubs (not just City) have ruined football. It's mostly about what happens if City win, and ends with just one token paragraph about us potentially losing.

"And if City ‘lose’? Well then we are into a world of asterisks and points deductions and glee from rival fans and the staining of one of the greatest club sides we have seen in the English game and punitive lawsuits that will last for eternity.

Whenever ‘imminent’ turns into now, both sides will claim victory and neither will be able to grasp that they have lost."
Click to expand...

What intrigues me about this, and similar articles, is what the author expected us to do once the PL, wholly supported by the media I might add, commenced their existential assault on the club. These proceedings and the APT proceedings are wholly of the PL's making and, apart from City, it's members bear total responsibility for any fall out.
 
bluenova said:
The article says that whatever the outcome, "nobody wins". It mentions quite a lot about how the big clubs (not just City) have ruined football. It's mostly about what happens if City win, and ends with just one token paragraph about us potentially losing.

"And if City ‘lose’? Well then we are into a world of asterisks and points deductions and glee from rival fans and the staining of one of the greatest club sides we have seen in the English game and punitive lawsuits that will last for eternity.

Whenever ‘imminent’ turns into now, both sides will claim victory and neither will be able to grasp that they have lost."
Click to expand...

What they all seem to ignore are facts concerning their darling clubs who were eating through players like locusts when the PL was formed, one example is the rags and when they were doing it they were lauded for it.

Now we are even not doing it year after year we are breaking football, under any form of consideration the cartel and the writers who support it have a lot to answer for.
Manchester United has broken the British transfer record the most times, with a total of six instances, including both incoming and outgoing deals.
Click to expand...
 
BusterPhillips said:
The Mike Keegan / Sky article is interesting.. prior to Tim Sherwood they've been brazen in their speculation of the charges, outcome and punishment.

No doubt City have been in touch. But for Sky to suggest that pundits need to stick to the facts implies that the result will trigger the emotionally attached pundits into saying something City would take offence at.

The only scenario this would happen, imo, is if we are cleared of the main charges and we are guilty of non cooperation.

Guess we'll see soon!
Click to expand...
Are you suggesting the Sky organisation knows we are in the clear but have managed to keep it quiet? Not feasible in my opinion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top