PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[halfcenturyup]

It isn't particularly nice work - I do it for fun largely because its filmed as live and is testing to be put on the spot. Nor was this summary from Super88 what was said and, as surprising as it may be, very many people do not have as deep an understanding of all aspects of this case as those who have participated in 10,000 pages of debate on here.

Did you mean to say (paraphrasing) "The PL and the clubs who are leading the charges" or did that just slip out?

Enjoyed the Trafford / Manchester jibe as well. Good man.

 

[danielwood5]

That's the format. Or do you hold with the Victorians that physiognomy speaks to a person's character, if such a thing exists?

I believe that Dr Gall nailed it, you can look at those faces and know that they're all wrong 'uns.

 

[DJBusinesscake]

Was interesting. But, Jamie Jackson. Jesus, how can he be a journalist without being able to string a sort of sentence together, you know?

Listening to him was painful wasn't it?!

'If you get what im trying to say', jesus christ mate yes, we get it!!

 

[Lord Blue]

Was interesting. But, Jamie Jackson. Jesus, how can he be a journalist without being able to string a sort of sentence together, you know?

to be fair, spoken word and written word are different beasts.

when i write something important, i usually end up rewriting bits. often making it less caustic.

just listening to it now but don't expect anything new, just a refresh.

 

[Ric]

Was interesting. But, Jamie Jackson. Jesus, how can he be a journalist without being able to string a sort of sentence together, you know?

He's not very articulate, and didn't come across particularly well, but at least he wasn't resorting to the sort of innuendoes or outright accusations of guilt that we get from other journalists. Small mercies, I guess.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

Are we there yet?

 

[slbsn]

And yet he claims he has not profited from the 115 case!

Here we go again. I have, in fact, been spectacularly and unnecessarily open as to who has paid me. I never said I have not taken some fees for my time from Talksport and one or two other places. Why on earth would I subsidise those companies. And I have never claimed I haven't taken fees.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

It isn't particularly nice work - I do it for fun largely because its filmed as live and is testing to be put on the spot. Nor was this summary from Super88 what was said and, as surprising as it may be, very many people do not have as deep an understanding of all aspects of this case as those who have participated in 10,000 pages of debate on here.

Not quite 10,000…

And I don’t understand how it’s not nice work if you describe it as fun? That doesn’t make any sense. Surely the best work of all is that which is fun, irrespective of whether it’s remunerated or not.

I do plenty of stuff on the house because I know it will be enjoyable, or to help someone out who needs it, or because the person in the other side is a ****, or being a ****. Doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy it just because I’m not getting weighed in. I do well enough, like you I expect, not to have to charge for every hour I work.

 

[IrishBloodEnglishHeart]

Thanks.

I have no idea who you are and have zero memory of ever interacting with you. But happy to have made an impression.

EDIT: According to search, our only ever interaction was several months ago where you claimed to have gone college with @twosips and I called you out for your jealous noncery. And upon reading the details you posted about him, he said you were full of shit. That was months ago mate. You dont still need to be hurt over it

Point proven.

 

[slbsn]

Did you mean to say (paraphrasing) "The PL and the clubs who are leading the charges" or did that just slip out?

Enjoyed the Trafford / Manchester jibe as well. Good man.

No I meant the legal team inside the PL. The clubs are insulated

 

[mexico1970]

Correct. and you're probably the most emotional poster on here.

That's close to being passive aggressive.

 

[Marvin.]

I believe that Dr Gall nailed it, you can look at those faces and know that they're all wrong 'uns.

I am not sure I believe that there is such a thing as wrong 'un. Human beings can hold ideas that we might regard as ugly. See the life of Bert Trautmann. In his younger life he was a brown shirt, in his older life he represented Manchester City. He was never a wrong 'un at any time in his life. Nazism was the problem.

We are Nature and nurture, and they interact. Evolution is the very act of environment changing Nature.

 

[Keeper!]

Here we go again. I have, in fact, been spectacularly and unnecessarily open as to who has paid me. I never said I have not taken some fees for my time from Talksport and one or two other places. Why on earth would I subsidise those companies. And I have never claimed I haven't taken fees.

I like I said before have zero issues that you get paid, so you should but your the one who claimed you have not profited from this case, which is simply a ridiculous comment.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

He's not very articulate, and didn't come across particularly well, but at least he wasn't resorting to the sort of innuendoes or outright accusations of guilt that we get from other journalists. Small mercies, I guess.

Your recent contributions towards the push for 10k have been greatly appreciated.

#pushfor10k

 

[Mr Grumpy]

If you are referring to the 2014 case, there was a settlement between UEFA and City in which it was explicitly stated the City did not accept they had broken any rules.

I find this so frustrating.
Even our own fans are polluted with the agenda and narratives being peddled by our enemies.
There is absolutely no arguing with anyone regarding these issues.
Arguments require that both side remain logical and rational. This just does not happen regarding same.
It also disappoints me on a deeper, more human level. Critical thinking is a skill which is dying fast in todays society of tic-tok and blip-verts. Everything is an absolute. We have lost the ability to appreciate nuance.

I'm ranting. Sorry, it's my age....

 

[Bluesince1979]

The red cartel along with the media have set out from the off to tarnish our achievements and label us as cheats , have we cheated on the pitch ? bribing referees , paying opposition players/officials to throw a game now thats cheating....so why the fuck would any trophies have to be handed back as most of the media have suggested ?

“Cheats”

“What have we been charged with?”

“………….. “

Tumble weed drifts past

“115!!!! Cheats”


It really is job done

 

[Mr Grumpy]

I like I said before have zero issues that you get paid, so you should but your the one who claimed you have not profited from this case, which is simply a ridiculous comment.

Shut up.

 

[slbsn]

Not quite 10,000…

And I don’t understand how it’s not nice work if you describe it as fun? That doesn’t make any sense. Surely the best work of all is that which is fun, irrespective of whether it’s remunerated or not.

I do plenty of stuff on the house because I know it will be enjoyable, or to help someone out who needs it, or because the person in the other side is a ****, or being a ****. Doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy it just because I’m not getting weighed in. I do well enough, like you I expect, not to have to charge for every hour I work.

I charge and it is fun. Just wouldn't call it particularly nice. It is quite time consuming, gets loads of shitty comments on socials and isn't massively well paid.

Just don't see why I need to get the same shitty comments (not in jest) from some of the more sensible people here as well. It is tiresome. Not a big deal, but tiresome. Anyone that actually watches it (did you even watch it?), will see that the content is some of the most informed analysis on these topics (albeit IMO).

 

[Mr Grumpy]

Your recent contributions towards the push for 10k have been greatly appreciated.

#pushfor10k

What's the forum record for the most number of pages in a single thread?

This one?

 

[slbsn]

I like I said before have zero issues that you get paid, so you should but your the one who claimed you have not profited from this case, which is simply a ridiculous comment.

1. No I didn't
2. Fuck off