PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I asked deep seek what it thought….

The question of whether Manchester City will be found guilty of the Premier League's charges is complex and hinges on several factors:

1. **Nature of Charges**: The Premier League has accused Manchester City of over 100 breaches of financial regulations, including misreporting financial information and non-compliance with UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules. These allegations are broader and more detailed than UEFA's previous case, which was overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in 2020 due to insufficient evidence and time-barred claims.

2. **Legal Precedents**:
- **UEFA vs. CAS**: While City successfully appealed UEFA's sanctions, the Premier League's process is distinct. Its rules allow for a lower burden of proof ("balance of probabilities" vs. UEFA's "beyond reasonable doubt") and include charges not subject to time limitations.
- **Recent Cases**: Everton and Nottingham Forest received points deductions for FFP breaches, demonstrating the Premier League's recent strict enforcement. However, City's case is more complex, involving alleged systemic dishonesty rather than straightforward overspending.

3. **Legal Resources and Strategy**: Manchester City has robust legal representation and has vehemently denied wrongdoing. Their previous victory against UEFA may inform their defense strategy, but the Premier League's independent commission operates under different procedural rules.

4. **Evidence and Complexity**: The case hinges on detailed financial records and interpretations of revenue reporting, sponsorship deals, and executive payments. Proving deliberate deception will require compelling documentation, which could be challenging given the opacity of financial structures.

5. **Potential Outcomes**: If found guilty, penalties could range from fines to points deductions or even expulsion. However, the unprecedented scale of the charges and City’s status as a top club make severe sanctions politically contentious. Any ruling is likely to face appeals, prolonging resolution.

6. **Timeline**: The case is expected to take months or years to resolve, with hearings reportedly set for late 2024. Delays and appeals could push final decisions into 2025 or beyond.

7. **Broader Implications**: The Premier League faces pressure to enforce rules impartially, but penalizing a dominant club like City risks significant commercial and reputational fallout. Conversely, leniency could undermine the league’s regulatory credibility.

**Conclusion**: Predicting the outcome is speculative. While the Premier League may be determined to assert authority, the burden of proof and City’s legal prowess pose significant hurdles. Historical precedent (e.g., the CAS ruling) and the complexity of financial evidence suggest a contentious battle, with possible negotiated settlements or mitigated penalties. Ultimately, the result will depend on the commission’s interpretation of the evidence and the effectiveness of City’s defense. Until proceedings conclude, uncertainty remains.
 
Pingu the Penguin said:
I asked deep seek what it thought….

The question of whether Manchester City will be found guilty of the Premier League's charges is complex and hinges on several factors:

1. **Nature of Charges**: The Premier League has accused Manchester City of over 100 breaches of financial regulations, including misreporting financial information and non-compliance with UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules. These allegations are broader and more detailed than UEFA's previous case, which was overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in 2020 due to insufficient evidence and time-barred claims.

2. **Legal Precedents**:
- **UEFA vs. CAS**: While City successfully appealed UEFA's sanctions, the Premier League's process is distinct. Its rules allow for a lower burden of proof ("balance of probabilities" vs. UEFA's "beyond reasonable doubt") and include charges not subject to time limitations.
- **Recent Cases**: Everton and Nottingham Forest received points deductions for FFP breaches, demonstrating the Premier League's recent strict enforcement. However, City's case is more complex, involving alleged systemic dishonesty rather than straightforward overspending.

3. **Legal Resources and Strategy**: Manchester City has robust legal representation and has vehemently denied wrongdoing. Their previous victory against UEFA may inform their defense strategy, but the Premier League's independent commission operates under different procedural rules.

4. **Evidence and Complexity**: The case hinges on detailed financial records and interpretations of revenue reporting, sponsorship deals, and executive payments. Proving deliberate deception will require compelling documentation, which could be challenging given the opacity of financial structures.

5. **Potential Outcomes**: If found guilty, penalties could range from fines to points deductions or even expulsion. However, the unprecedented scale of the charges and City’s status as a top club make severe sanctions politically contentious. Any ruling is likely to face appeals, prolonging resolution.

6. **Timeline**: The case is expected to take months or years to resolve, with hearings reportedly set for late 2024. Delays and appeals could push final decisions into 2025 or beyond.

7. **Broader Implications**: The Premier League faces pressure to enforce rules impartially, but penalizing a dominant club like City risks significant commercial and reputational fallout. Conversely, leniency could undermine the league’s regulatory credibility.

**Conclusion**: Predicting the outcome is speculative. While the Premier League may be determined to assert authority, the burden of proof and City’s legal prowess pose significant hurdles. Historical precedent (e.g., the CAS ruling) and the complexity of financial evidence suggest a contentious battle, with possible negotiated settlements or mitigated penalties. Ultimately, the result will depend on the commission’s interpretation of the evidence and the effectiveness of City’s defense. Until proceedings conclude, uncertainty remains.
Click to expand...
Thanks, that’s probably the best summary I have seen.
 
Pingu the Penguin said:
I asked deep seek what it thought….

The question of whether Manchester City will be found guilty of the Premier League's charges is complex and hinges on several factors:

1. **Nature of Charges**: The Premier League has accused Manchester City of over 100 breaches of financial regulations, including misreporting financial information and non-compliance with UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules. These allegations are broader and more detailed than UEFA's previous case, which was overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in 2020 due to insufficient evidence and time-barred claims.

2. **Legal Precedents**:
- **UEFA vs. CAS**: While City successfully appealed UEFA's sanctions, the Premier League's process is distinct. Its rules allow for a lower burden of proof ("balance of probabilities" vs. UEFA's "beyond reasonable doubt") and include charges not subject to time limitations.
- **Recent Cases**: Everton and Nottingham Forest received points deductions for FFP breaches, demonstrating the Premier League's recent strict enforcement. However, City's case is more complex, involving alleged systemic dishonesty rather than straightforward overspending.

3. **Legal Resources and Strategy**: Manchester City has robust legal representation and has vehemently denied wrongdoing. Their previous victory against UEFA may inform their defense strategy, but the Premier League's independent commission operates under different procedural rules.

4. **Evidence and Complexity**: The case hinges on detailed financial records and interpretations of revenue reporting, sponsorship deals, and executive payments. Proving deliberate deception will require compelling documentation, which could be challenging given the opacity of financial structures.

5. **Potential Outcomes**: If found guilty, penalties could range from fines to points deductions or even expulsion. However, the unprecedented scale of the charges and City’s status as a top club make severe sanctions politically contentious. Any ruling is likely to face appeals, prolonging resolution.

6. **Timeline**: The case is expected to take months or years to resolve, with hearings reportedly set for late 2024. Delays and appeals could push final decisions into 2025 or beyond.

7. **Broader Implications**: The Premier League faces pressure to enforce rules impartially, but penalizing a dominant club like City risks significant commercial and reputational fallout. Conversely, leniency could undermine the league’s regulatory credibility.

**Conclusion**: Predicting the outcome is speculative. While the Premier League may be determined to assert authority, the burden of proof and City’s legal prowess pose significant hurdles. Historical precedent (e.g., the CAS ruling) and the complexity of financial evidence suggest a contentious battle, with possible negotiated settlements or mitigated penalties. Ultimately, the result will depend on the commission’s interpretation of the evidence and the effectiveness of City’s defense. Until proceedings conclude, uncertainty remains.
Click to expand...
annoying that it doesn't really mention the possibility that we are completely innocent but rather talks about difficulty in proving the case. even AI has it in for us it seems. who does deep seek support anyway? can you ask it?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250501-174721.png
    Screenshot_20250501-174721.png
    537 KB · Views: 177
Lord Blue said:
annoying that it doesn't really mention the possibility that we are completely innocent but rather talks about difficulty in proving the case. even AI has it in for us it seems. who does deep seek support anyway? can you ask it?
Click to expand...
It can only distill what is out there not have an original thought; so given no **** has ever written about our "innocence" it hasn't got a clue.
The great irony of "AI" is if it only learns from myopic one sided drivel it will display no intelligence but just output refined bullshit.
 
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
Is your guess based on your worst fears, you have inside knowledge or just a plain punt?
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
We have done fuck all wrong.

What part of that do you and other posters not understand?

We're being punished for doing things correctly, exposing the corruption and lies from the premier league and uncovering all these real dodgy owners who are taking the piss getting away with putting their own money into their clubs but disguising it.
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
There is nothing conclusive whatsoever about your prediction. Quite the opposite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top