PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

manimanc said:
We have done fuck all wrong.

What part of that do you and other posters not understand?

We're being punished for doing things correctly, exposing the corruption and lies from the premier league and uncovering all these real dodgy owners who are taking the piss getting away with putting their own money into their clubs but disguising it.
Click to expand...

The organisation that is accusing City with their numerous charges have had it established that they have ran an illegal rule book from 2021, have acted in bad faith and dragged their feet on requests by City. They allow other clubs to gain unfair advantages from interest free director loans whilst coming after one club for how much their manager got paid in 2009 when their was no PSR and player image rights which UEfA could have gone after as it wasn’t time barred but didn’t see any issue with.

The PL has the ear of clubs like the rags and Spurs who are two clubs with some of the most significant amounts of debt in European football have the PLs ear pushing their agenda. With their other chums in North London and Merseyside they have the Richard Masters in their pocket doing their bidding for them with the associated parties fiasco an established fact which could end up getting even more painful for the PL by the end of 2025.

It’s not been established that City have done anything wrong warranting any form of financial or sporting sanction. It has been established that the Premier League knowingly or unknowingly operates illegal rule books and advices their members that it’s ok to survive on interest free loans to get round PSR. If they can say City’s accounts are wrong for over a decade, they should now be running the rule over other accounts of other clubs which will be a lot worse in relation to PSR and back dating it. They won’t because it will mean they will have to sanction some of their favoured clubs. It’s check mate from our legal team, Richard Masters has ran out of road.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
The organisation that is accusing City with their numerous charges have had it established that they have ran an illegal rule book from 2021, have acted in bad faith and dragged their feet on requests by City. They allow other clubs to gain unfair advantages from interest free director loans whilst coming after one club for how much their manager got paid in 2009 when their was no PSR and player image rights which UEfA could have gone after as it wasn’t time barred but didn’t see any issue with.

The PL has the ear of clubs like the rags and Spurs who are two clubs with some of the most significant amounts of debt in European football have the PLs ear pushing their agenda. With their other chums in North London and Merseyside they have the Richard Masters in their pocket doing their bidding for them with the associated parties fiasco an established fact which could end up getting even more painful for the PL by the end of 2025.

It’s not been established that City have done anything wrong warranting any form of financial or sporting sanction. It has been established that the Premier League knowingly or unknowingly operates illegal rule books and advices their members that it’s ok to survive on interest free loans to get round PSR. If they can say City’s accounts are wrong for over a decade, they should now be running the rule over other accounts of other clubs which will be a lot worse in relation to PSR and back dating it. They won’t because it will mean they will have to sanction some of their favoured clubs. It’s check mate from our legal team, Richard Masters has ran out of road.
Click to expand...

Perfect explanation!
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
The organisation that is accusing City with their numerous charges have had it established that they have ran an illegal rule book from 2021, have acted in bad faith and dragged their feet on requests by City. They allow other clubs to gain unfair advantages from interest free director loans whilst coming after one club for how much their manager got paid in 2009 when their was no PSR and player image rights which UEfA could have gone after as it wasn’t time barred but didn’t see any issue with.

The PL has the ear of clubs like the rags and Spurs who are two clubs with some of the most significant amounts of debt in European football have the PLs ear pushing their agenda. With their other chums in North London and Merseyside they have the Richard Masters in their pocket doing their bidding for them with the associated parties fiasco an established fact which could end up getting even more painful for the PL by the end of 2025.

It’s not been established that City have done anything wrong warranting any form of financial or sporting sanction. It has been established that the Premier League knowingly or unknowingly operates illegal rule books and advices their members that it’s ok to survive on interest free loans to get round PSR. If they can say City’s accounts are wrong for over a decade, they should now be running the rule over other accounts of other clubs which will be a lot worse in relation to PSR and back dating it. They won’t because it will mean they will have to sanction some of their favoured clubs. It’s check mate from our legal team, Richard Masters has ran out of road.
Click to expand...
Fantastic description mate.
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. If you think we will be guilty of some of the charges then elaborate on which ones exactly? I reckon you’re falling for their deliberate numbers game - well if there’s 115 charges some of them must be right
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
The organisation that is accusing City with their numerous charges have had it established that they have ran an illegal rule book from 2021, have acted in bad faith and dragged their feet on requests by City. They allow other clubs to gain unfair advantages from interest free director loans whilst coming after one club for how much their manager got paid in 2009 when their was no PSR and player image rights which UEfA could have gone after as it wasn’t time barred but didn’t see any issue with.

The PL has the ear of clubs like the rags and Spurs who are two clubs with some of the most significant amounts of debt in European football have the PLs ear pushing their agenda. With their other chums in North London and Merseyside they have the Richard Masters in their pocket doing their bidding for them with the associated parties fiasco an established fact which could end up getting even more painful for the PL by the end of 2025.

It’s not been established that City have done anything wrong warranting any form of financial or sporting sanction. It has been established that the Premier League knowingly or unknowingly operates illegal rule books and advices their members that it’s ok to survive on interest free loans to get round PSR. If they can say City’s accounts are wrong for over a decade, they should now be running the rule over other accounts of other clubs which will be a lot worse in relation to PSR and back dating it. They won’t because it will mean they will have to sanction some of their favoured clubs. It’s check mate from our legal team, Richard Masters has ran out of road.
Click to expand...
Serious post Emile.
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
Awww.
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure you understand what the word ‘conclusive’ means
 
DiscoSteve said:
probably because of Islamic laws that disallow money being used to earn money from (I think)
Click to expand...
correct..............As a matter of faith, a Muslim cannot lend money to, or receive money from someone and expect to benefit – interest (known as riba) is not allowed. To make money from money is forbidden – wealth can only be generated through legitimate trade and investment in assets. Money must be used in a productive way.
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
Sniff Sniff.
 
Blueknows said:
correct..............As a matter of faith, a Muslim cannot lend money to, or receive money from someone and expect to benefit – interest (known as riba) is not allowed. To make money from money is forbidden – wealth can only be generated through legitimate trade and investment in assets. Money must be used in a productive way.
Click to expand...
usury I think, but....these would have been interest free loans...or lets face it...gifts..so no gain?
 
Truesilverblue said:
It's an .old summary but very conclusive still. My guess of the outcome is, will be found guilty of some charges, how many is anyone's guess, there will be a heavy fine and probably some points deduction. At this stage noone knows for sure. They also need to take into consideration anything more serious could result in a breakaway and a super league, Barcelona and Real Madrid and top Italian clubs still have it on their agenda. PSG will also be very keen should it happen. And more will follow sooner or later.
Click to expand...
PSG won’t be involved in the Super League. Their executives pretty much run UEFA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top