PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Spurs recently appointed a new DoF and a new CEO, ex Arsenal no less. The Lewis family are reported to have planned a new broom for some time. They now have a new non-exec chairman. With the new manager, it’s a complete overhaul, moving from financial focus to glory seeking. I suspect they’ll be more competitive from now on and move right up the league. That won’t bother us as they always beat us anyway.
well that will be interesting as the red lot have always treated spurs like their little bitch i wonder how they will react when they come for a slice of 'their' pie.
 
Spurs recently appointed a new DoF and a new CEO, ex Arsenal no less. The Lewis family are reported to have planned a new broom for some time. They now have a new non-exec chairman. With the new manager, it’s a complete overhaul, moving from financial focus to glory seeking. I suspect they’ll be more competitive from now on and move right up the league. That won’t bother us as they always beat us anyway.
This explains why they tried to buy half of our team during the transfer window.
 
They seem to be saying they wanted the transfer window out of the way first, but who knows ?

Could simply be your average corporate America brutal sacking but I guess it'll come out in the wash at some point.
It was a topic of conversation last night on the back pages programme. It seems that he has been pushed out by the owners.
 
It was a topic of conversation last night on the back pages programme. It seems that he has been pushed out by the owners.

He has been pushed out by the owners. That's the way it works.

The question is why now? There could be lots of reasons, of course but I can imagine when Mansour changes Khaldoon for someone else it will be at the end of a season; or when Soriano goes it won't be three games into a season.

Just a little strange.
 
To pause the Levy discussions for a second, and return to the equally irrelevant Paqueta point, I found this an interesting comment in the outcome of the commission review, on finding the FA had no evidence in charging the player.

The comission said this was "a salient reminder to the panel not to jump to conclusions and the dangers of drawing adverse inferences from events unknown".
 
To pause the Levy discussions for a second, and return to the equally irrelevant Paqueta point, I found this an interesting comment in the outcome of the commission review, on finding the FA had no evidence in charging the player.

The comission said this was "a salient reminder to the panel not to jump to conclusions and the dangers of drawing adverse inferences from events unknown".

“Everyone knows…….”
 
Daniel Levy’s negotiation style mirrors the Trump playbook—aggressive, transactional, and short-sighted. That kind of posturing might win a headline, but it rarely builds the trust needed for sustainable, win-win outcomes. Over time, people simply stop wanting to do business with you. Relationships matter, and Levy’s approach has too often burned bridges instead of building them.
Could be something to do with Savinho staying, despite them offering money that would be stupid not to accept.

The reports of ‘Soriano blocked the move’, why would do that if Pep and Viana were happy enough to let him go.
 
Could be something to do with Savinho staying, despite them offering money that would be stupid not to accept.

The reports of ‘Soriano blocked the move’, why would do that if Pep and Viana were happy enough to let him go.

It was Khaldoon apparently.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top