PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Masters said recently that his meeting with the redshirts was not to vet him but to ask what he thought about City. That’s even worse, but Masters couldn’t see it.
So he had a private meeting with our commercial rivals to talk about our club. Not just a moron but a corrupt one.
 
Masters said recently that his meeting with the redshirts was not to vet him but to ask what he thought about City. That’s even worse, but Masters couldn’t see it.
Who did he say that to?? And what was he asked that resulted in that answer ?
 
Surely he couldn't be stupid enough to actually believe that shit, even if he expects others to.

Hopefully the **** is going to pay for his role in all the problems which have been thrown at us as a consequence of his subservience to the US owners cabal.
What shit??
 
So he had a private meeting with our commercial rivals to talk about our club. Not just a moron but a corrupt one.
Not very private now??? Makes no sense. In what context would they be talking about us & why has Masters revealed this?
 
I've thought all along that city know there innocent and have the evidence to prove it so have just been stringing the premier League along,
Basically holding the investigation up for years to cause maximum embarrassment to masters and co.
Can city appeal a non cooperation??
 
I've thought all along that city know there innocent and have the evidence to prove it so have just been stringing the premier League along,
Basically holding the investigation up for years to cause maximum embarrassment to masters and co.
Can city appeal a non cooperation??
Very limited and narrow possibility of appealing anything, this has been covered extensively over the last 5778 pages. Of course the panel may say we did cooperate at which point we wouldn't need to appeal anyway.
 
I dont think they are in the business of making the decision and then sitting on it for weeks or months until there's a international break so they can release it. Fantasy stuff.

It will happen now wont it.
The club and the premier league could have a requested the announcement to be given in the international break, so the biggest story in premier league history doesn't disrupt premier league matches.
 
The club and the premier league could have a requested the announcement to be given in the international break, so the biggest story in premier league history doesn't disrupt premier league matches.
Because the follow up and fall out will only last one week?
 
I've thought all along that city know there innocent and have the evidence to prove it so have just been stringing the premier League along,
Basically holding the investigation up for years to cause maximum embarrassment to masters and co.
Can city appeal a non cooperation??
Fanciful beyond comprehension this, mate.
 
Because the follow up and fall out will only last one week?
A lot can happen in a week.
Announced on Monday 6th, Tuesday 7th October, no premier league games till the 18th, managers press conferences begin on the 16th.
England national team games , fa media team say the national manager will only talk about England games.
So 10, 9 days for the fall out to drop off
 
So he had a private meeting with our commercial rivals to talk about our club. Not just a moron but a corrupt one.
Is that correct though?

Was he employed to ensure that City would never get a fair deal?
Is that illegal?
Is there somewhere in his Contract of Employment that states he must act fairly to all Clubs if so maybe he the scapegoat but if the objective of the PL is to promote the red cartel in preference to others maybe he is OK and other Clubs can pick up crumbs is their Mission Statement then he was apparently employed legally.
This only changed when City picked up the UK Legal Law angle.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top