Agreed. Much better than Sunderland.
Sunderland is EPL at least, also big sam might be a clogger type, but is the right manager to get him playing for the team first and foremost.
I'd say sunderland would benefit him most.
Agreed. Much better than Sunderland.
Sunderland is EPL at least, also big sam might be a clogger type, but is the right manager to get him playing for the team first and foremost.
I'd say sunderland would benefit him most.
I just don't see any reason why he'd play him. On loan kid in a relegation scrap? Be benched after one game.
No club is going to agree a minimum playing time for a young player when so much cash depends on where they finish. And Fulham who actually owned him barely played him in the latter half of the season when there: http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/patrick-roberts/leistungsdaten/spieler/225452/plus/0?saison=2014. He only appeared in 17 league matches, averaging just 20 minutes per game.Perhaps...although he'd get more chances than at city. Better to have half the games at Prem league standard than twice the amount at championship level.
Maybe make an agreement on minimum amount of appearances/minutes when he goes anywhere.
I think he's the sort of player who's going to be hard to loan out to english sides in general. When the going gets tough, the tiny luxury players who don't track back tend to be the first to get dropped.