cleavers
Moderator
Re: Mangala
MP wants defenders who can tackle, and put us on to the attack, he wants our defenders to start the attacks, Mangala can do this, Nastasic couldn't. Nastasic is a good defender, but that's all he does, MP doesn't want that, he wants other attributes (whether fans like it or not).
Most CB's don't get anywhere near their best until about 28, so Mangala has 5 years to mature , he's also learning from two great CB's with vast experience, and needs time alongside both to learn, and while he will make mistakes, he'll get better at it.
Nastasic is on the "scrap heap" because he was advised to find another club, and he failed.
You can't compare the two players because the football we play has changed greatly from the style that Nastasic was brought in for, and that is why Nastasic is nowhere near the team, he simply can't play the way this team/manager wants to play.bobmcfc said:I think his price is the reason people get all defensive about him and imagine all these qualities that he just doesn't posess. He's 23 ! That is not young in my opinion, I think nastasic showed just as much if not more potential than Mangala and where is he now ? Consigned to the scrap heap because he dropped a bollock against Chelsea. Easier to discard than mangala because he didn't come with the hefty price tag I guess
MP wants defenders who can tackle, and put us on to the attack, he wants our defenders to start the attacks, Mangala can do this, Nastasic couldn't. Nastasic is a good defender, but that's all he does, MP doesn't want that, he wants other attributes (whether fans like it or not).
Most CB's don't get anywhere near their best until about 28, so Mangala has 5 years to mature , he's also learning from two great CB's with vast experience, and needs time alongside both to learn, and while he will make mistakes, he'll get better at it.
Nastasic is on the "scrap heap" because he was advised to find another club, and he failed.