B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
Could we get docked points over this shit?
Could we get docked points over this shit?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Player topic: Frank Lampard (2014/15)
- Thread starter cityok
- Start date
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
My question is which papers?Gaylord du Bois said:Someone's pissed on their pastrami.dan05delaney said:The American sports papers are running wild, and I thought our papers were bad
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
We've done everything legal, so no.
But we're man city, so probably will.
BLUEMATT23 said:Could we get docked points over this shit?
We've done everything legal, so no.
But we're man city, so probably will.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
We would have had to have done something wrong in the first place don't you think?BLUEMATT23 said:Could we get docked points over this shit?
Jung the foreman
Well-Known Member
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
He's gained us 7 points already so let emColinLee said:We would have had to have done something wrong in the first place don't you think?BLUEMATT23 said:Could we get docked points over this shit?
moon
Well-Known Member
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
If every one on talk sport had their way we would
BLUEMATT23 said:Could we get docked points over this shit?
If every one on talk sport had their way we would
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
If he signed a 6 month deal we've broken PL rules.
If he signed for New York then signed a contract at City we have broken PL rules
If he signed a CFG contract then we have probably broken PL rules depending on how they view third part ownership
ColinLee said:We would have had to have done something wrong in the first place don't you think?BLUEMATT23 said:Could we get docked points over this shit?
If he signed a 6 month deal we've broken PL rules.
If he signed for New York then signed a contract at City we have broken PL rules
If he signed a CFG contract then we have probably broken PL rules depending on how they view third part ownership
Blueband Brother
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 4,091
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
It was an FA cup break last weekend so maybe things are a bit slow but that does not divert from the fact that there are many people that overreact and live on the obvious biased sensationalism of certain media outlets like Daily Mail. I understand that there is a need to talk about something but at least let it not be in reaction to issues that does not affect the bottom line and does not affect to prospects of the club.
Like the agenda thing and this Lampard nonsense story conveniently brought just as the premier league resumed, the reality of bias, hatred and in this case utter desperation to derail and besmirch anything and everything in the club whilst capitalizing and exploiting a considerable portion of the public, who admittedly share the same feelings as junk papers like the Daily Mail , does not and will not affect the club and so they should not be validated by constant reactions by people here.
If they want to hate, let them hate. We should not give a flying you know what because the bottom line is that we are moving forward, progressing and even the scheme of the FFP, specifically designed to stop us does not seem to have stopped us in our tracks and it never will.
We are top of the league.
There are also many other things that are infuriating the media ranging from macroscopic things like the CFA to microscopic but still as pertinent fact that the EDS looked good against Chelsea the other night which puts a spanner to their agenda that City is going to spend and spend and ''ruin the game'' with no interest in bringing young players through. The likes of Barker and many impressive youngsters have certainly made them sweat a bit.
My message is this, you should be able to filter away nonsense and focus on the bottom line, which is upward and onward regardless of any schemes by the media, UEFA, or any other forces out there hell bent on making sure that their detached, envious and irrational feelings and opinions are validated regardless of the reality.
NYCFC will be without Lampard for only 3 months or so (into the MLS season) and then he will join them and stay there for the rest of his career. Lampard is a fit, professional and gifted player that has at least another two years of football in him. This is the bottom line and we should just move on and ignore all the nonsense made because of this.
It was an FA cup break last weekend so maybe things are a bit slow but that does not divert from the fact that there are many people that overreact and live on the obvious biased sensationalism of certain media outlets like Daily Mail. I understand that there is a need to talk about something but at least let it not be in reaction to issues that does not affect the bottom line and does not affect to prospects of the club.
Like the agenda thing and this Lampard nonsense story conveniently brought just as the premier league resumed, the reality of bias, hatred and in this case utter desperation to derail and besmirch anything and everything in the club whilst capitalizing and exploiting a considerable portion of the public, who admittedly share the same feelings as junk papers like the Daily Mail , does not and will not affect the club and so they should not be validated by constant reactions by people here.
If they want to hate, let them hate. We should not give a flying you know what because the bottom line is that we are moving forward, progressing and even the scheme of the FFP, specifically designed to stop us does not seem to have stopped us in our tracks and it never will.
We are top of the league.
There are also many other things that are infuriating the media ranging from macroscopic things like the CFA to microscopic but still as pertinent fact that the EDS looked good against Chelsea the other night which puts a spanner to their agenda that City is going to spend and spend and ''ruin the game'' with no interest in bringing young players through. The likes of Barker and many impressive youngsters have certainly made them sweat a bit.
My message is this, you should be able to filter away nonsense and focus on the bottom line, which is upward and onward regardless of any schemes by the media, UEFA, or any other forces out there hell bent on making sure that their detached, envious and irrational feelings and opinions are validated regardless of the reality.
NYCFC will be without Lampard for only 3 months or so (into the MLS season) and then he will join them and stay there for the rest of his career. Lampard is a fit, professional and gifted player that has at least another two years of football in him. This is the bottom line and we should just move on and ignore all the nonsense made because of this.
yayas trusty right foot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Dec 2009
- Messages
- 1,634
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
I am more bothered that it will affect our season, rather than NYCFC..
It will be interesting to see how Frank performs from now till the end of the season and whether this will affect his performances ?
I am more bothered that it will affect our season, rather than NYCFC..
It will be interesting to see how Frank performs from now till the end of the season and whether this will affect his performances ?
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
Not football related but I wonder what our owners think of this particular newspaper owner (Times and Sun)?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/01/10/rupert-mudoch-paris-attacks-charlie-hebdo_n_6447716.html?utm_hp_ref=uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/01 ... _hp_ref=uk</a>
Will we see a witch hunt by all the National Press (MCFC scale) or will it be simply swept under the carpet by the press ?
Not football related but I wonder what our owners think of this particular newspaper owner (Times and Sun)?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/01/10/rupert-mudoch-paris-attacks-charlie-hebdo_n_6447716.html?utm_hp_ref=uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/01 ... _hp_ref=uk</a>
Will we see a witch hunt by all the National Press (MCFC scale) or will it be simply swept under the carpet by the press ?