The fuckin' "goal Crease"?If our defense was breached or being penetrated by Moses and he scored inside our box then we can rightly put the blame on the defense.
But to suggest that its their fault and not Hart's (main culprit) is disingenouous. Might as well place a traffic cone at the GOAL CREASE.
Another Joe's fan who instea.
Yet again you come out with the asinine, half baked, insults.
Listen, not everyone sees things precisely the same way you do, halfwit.
Disagree by all means, but don't try and characterise people who see things differently to you as some kind of clown with no understanding of the sport.
It's insincere, and pathetic. It's the lowest common denominator of a response.
It's not true, and it just goes to show that you're incapable of countering any of the points raised, or articulating your own counter argument.
I've made my position clear, I've said why I feel the way I do. If you disagree you could always reply to my posts and let me know what you dispute and why, and then maybe we could have a discussion.
Or your could just carry on with this type of lazy shit that contributes nothing to the thread or the forum.
Very apt and cogently expressed.
Not now, Kato.Don't be like the frog in the well
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crease
Be less parochial or ethnocentric
Cliche that is apt for the second goal that Hart let in.
@blueplan You say Adrian performed better than Hart, yet he was beaten by a shot from range that didn't even go in the corner. Hart wasn't to blame for those goals.
Who? 'Goal crease', never :⊙(Yawn.
Don't be like the frog in the well
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crease
Be less parochial or ethnocentric
Cliche that is apt for the second goal that Hart let in.
And yet let in a shot from De Bruyne that was as saveable as Moses' shot.When in comparison his counterpart at the other end outperformed him.
The first goal is save able, for a top goalie, as he has LOS. Hart's has an inherent weakness .. not great reading, anticipation, positioning and quick reaction or reflexes due to his large size or frame, that led to goals especially on the left side. It was not a grass cutter by any stretch.
Likewise 2nd goal he was hoping to backstop (with his butterfly style or stretched arms -- a reactive exercise ) rather than being proactive.
These are my observations and it also dovetailed with the notion that he is not comfortable with his feet or distribution due to his lack of 'football skills or football nous' in augmenting or strengthening our back four and our dominating brand of football rather than the 'hoofed and lumped football' that Hart displayed. Very exasperating to see that when he has the time and space to distribute with his feet.
As some of us posted he is a weak link which as a top WC club we need to address. We can't be sentimental just because he is English. We need a top notch GK that is head and shoulder above the typical quintessential goalie in the modern era of football.