Rolee said:Zubrman said:jimharri said:Agreed. Why did he/his agent feel the need to post that tweet, knowing full well the trouble that may cause. Basically, he's contradicting what the manager said. Even if what he tweeted is true, he should have kept quiet.
Furthermore, why did the club feel the need to retweet it?
Because it's absolutely harmless and it reassures fans that believed he will miss the Sunderland game due to injury that he's ready to go for said game.
It's only mardarses reading into it something that it isn't.
Btw he's not contradicting Pellegrini, Pellegrini said he rested him because he felt a strain in his groin before the Baggies game, Yaya has reaffirmed that he was rested.
Don't you think it's a legitimate talking point though? A lot of discussion has taken place in other threads regarding Yaya being rested/injured. The general consensus beforehand was the former and only afterwards did it become the latter.OB1 said:Rolee said:Zubrman said:Furthermore, why did the club feel the need to retweet it?
Because it's absolutely harmless and it reassures fans that believed he will miss the Sunderland game due to injury that he's ready to go for said game.
It's only mardarses reading into it something that it isn't.
Btw he's not contradicting Pellegrini, Pellegrini said he rested him because he felt a strain in his groin before the Baggies game, Yaya has reaffirmed that he was rested.
No, it cannot be that simple. This has to be a major conspiracy to hoodwink the brilliant minds of the Blue Moon masses.
Pablo1 said:Don't you think it's a legitimate talking point though?
Except my last paragraph agrees with you dickhead, so before you quote parts of posts trying to make yourself look clever, at least acknowledge those points.Mister Appointment said:Pablo1 said:Don't you think it's a legitimate talking point though?
Not at all. We didn't drop points because Toure wasn't available and the manager is entitled to rest players at his discretion, especially with two games in 48 hours. The only reason it's a talking point is because people are trying to correlate the dropped points with Toure's absence. Which is a nonsense.
Still if we eradicated all the nonsense from Bluemoon there'd be little left, so on that basis carry on.
Pablo1 said:Except my last paragraph agrees with you dickhead, so before you quote parts of posts trying to make yourself look clever, at least acknowledge those points.Mister Appointment said:Pablo1 said:Don't you think it's a legitimate talking point though?
Not at all. We didn't drop points because Toure wasn't available and the manager is entitled to rest players at his discretion, especially with two games in 48 hours. The only reason it's a talking point is because people are trying to correlate the dropped points with Toure's absence. Which is a nonsense.
Still if we eradicated all the nonsense from Bluemoon there'd be little left, so on that basis carry on.
chris85mcfc said:Rolee said:Rammy Blue said:Thing is though, he could have been on bench with every intention of not being used unless it was an emergency, it ended up being a game where he would have been used after an hour to try and regain control and would have been worth the risk.
Like I said with hindsight that's great but really we should've had enough to hammer Burnley without the need to risk him.
Sounds like you went into the game with the same mindset as the manager
Once again we have been undone by underestimating the opposition
Resting players is fine in games like that but its important to make sure the players go out with the right attitude, in the second half that clearly wasn't the case
Crack on Billy, I'll always be available for you.Mister Appointment said:Pablo1 said:Except my last paragraph agrees with you dickhead, so before you quote parts of posts trying to make yourself look clever, at least acknowledge those points.Mister Appointment said:Not at all. We didn't drop points because Toure wasn't available and the manager is entitled to rest players at his discretion, especially with two games in 48 hours. The only reason it's a talking point is because people are trying to correlate the dropped points with Toure's absence. Which is a nonsense.
Still if we eradicated all the nonsense from Bluemoon there'd be little left, so on that basis carry on.
I'm not trying to make myself look like anything. You asked a question and I gave my opinion on it.
Oh and there was no need for the 'dickhead' comment. That's twice you've resorted to abuse and I've let it slide. There won't be a third time.
You concentrate on sinking plenty of Guiness and enjoying the new year festivities Oakie - in fact my train is just pulling into Glasgow so I shall do the same, hopefully avoid Ebola and see you all on the other side. All the best :)oakiecokie said:Fuck me there`s some wet vaginas on this forum !!