Matty
Well-Known Member
Blue Mist said:Ding Dong said:What about another alternative where "loyal fans" are offered tickets for £15 for the final home group game at the start of the season. Without knowing who we play, or if it`s meaningless. [ Cup Scheme ].Dubai Blue said:The only alternative is to make absolutely everyone else pay £33 for this game and play it in front of thousands of empty seats. What else could they do? I'm amazed they're actually sticking to such a high general sale price, so at least give them some credit for that.
The price you paid was fair when you paid it. They can't factor in the fact that demand for the final game might be exceptionally low, just as they can't factor in the demand being exceptionally high. As I said, that's just the risk you take when buying things in advance; there's no point getting upset by it.
If it turns out we play Plezen with nothing on the game. The attendance is the same as it will be next week. 3/4 full with cup schemers, members of GMP + families & friends, virgin empioyees, NHS employees, students and any amature footballer who wants to apply through their FA.
Or it turns out we play Bayern where the winner goes through to the knockout stages. The attendance is FULL with cup schemers paying /sorry already paid £15, and anyone else scrambling for all remaining tickets priced £33 [or more].
If option 1 happens - next years cup scheme remains the same. [ fans willing to pay up front regardless]
If option2 happens - next years cup scheme is increased. [fans not wanting to miss out]
AND NOBODY RIPPED OFF
WARNING. If you come up with any more sensible suggestions like that you will be banned.
How is that sensible?
Manchester City are two things, they are a football club, and they are a business. Why on earth, as a business, would you agree to sell tickets to thousands of "scheme members" for £15 when you can sell them for more than that? How many people, out of the at a guess 40,000 who will attend the Plzen game, do you honestly think will be paying £15 compared with the £28 or £33 that others are paying? How much lost revenue is that if they were all paying just £15 up front? What if it had turned out to be the Bayern game? Tickets for that were sold at more than £33 to none scheme members, and more than £28 to scheme members.
Lets assume the game doesn't change (it's Plzen) and the price is set at £15 for all upfront.
We get 40,000 attending, 20,000 scheme members and 20,000 non scheme members (2,000 of which would have been eligible to the £15 tickets under the GMP initiative). The total revenue from ticket sales here is 40,000 x £15 = £600,000.
Now lets say the ticket pricing is the same as this season. £28 for scheme members, £33 for the rest (apart from GMP who can get them for £15).
We get less attending due to the price, lets say only 35,000. 20,000 scheme members, 15,000 non scheme members (2,000 of which would have been eligible to the £15 tickets under the GMP initiative). The total revenue from ticket sales here is (20,000 x £28) + (13,000 x £33) + (2,000 x £15) = £1,085,000.
That's a difference of £485,000 in revenue, nearly half a million.
That's just an example, with some numbers clearly guessed at, but the point was just to illustrate quite how much money City would be throwing away if they did this. It just doesn't make any sense financially. The fact they previously did this in a domestic cup, then drew United and lost out on huge sums of money, has probably chastened City into not doing this again.