Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,081
How would a lexit campaign ever have media support? There is no traditional media outlets that would be likely to take such a position and recommend it. But it got coverage by columnists taking devil's advocate positions. The reality is that you have to accept that hard left positions will never get wide coverage by established media outlets and you have to fight within the political arena that exists not one of your choosing.
Mcdonnell and Abbott were of similar persuasions, and both heavily backed remain. When Corbyn first came to power, he used "we" rather than "I", he didn't mean it as a royal we. On that basis It would be out of place for him to turn around and dictate the party position based on historical views.
The trouble with not having your voice heard loudly and broadly is that it doesn't take on a distinctive and definitive character. Nobody can answer what Lexit claimed to be because there many versions. The are contemporaneous publications in sites like socialistworker prereferendum that advocated Lexit as an opportunity following the collapse of a chaos engulfed Tory party that evoked ideas that sound heavily wedded in socialist theory of 20th century figures.
Unlike Lexit, Brexit had a distinct voice in the form of vote leave and leave.Eu. Although there were two camps, one was just a more cynical bare-faced version that did the heavy lifting of stoking naked xenophobia. Both Farage and Boris are proponents of neo-mercantilism and low tax regimes first and foremost.
Remain and reform, although a fringe argument was still better articulated and had wider support than Lexit.
This country is not the only one prone to simplistic propaganda tools, see Germany's Swabian housewife vs the Southern European grasshoppers evoked by Merkel against Greece. Human beings are prone to reductive storytelling at the expense of truth and reason, propaganda can always evolve and survive.
For example austerity could die but ideas of neo-liberal politics and economics could grow and renew- there are still chronically infected in reservoirs of nutjobberery ready to beat its drum.
Lexit never took hold because it was a shit idea not rooted in reality. There were ways to skirt around state aid laws to further public ownership and greater intervention in key industries without unleashing the destructive and corrosive forces of Brexit.
British governments had idealogical reasons for not intervening in circumstances where the French and Germans would have done, but evoked state aid rules to escape scrutiny.
Is it Pethaps more likely that Corbyn took a position more in keeping with the reality of the country and his party than any act of politcal sabotage or cowardice? He was a man who never wanted to be a leader and showed it with his characteristically counterproductive stubbornness and indecision.
The politics of false betrayal and grievance is a right wing trait that the hardline Lexiteers have adopted and will cling to throughout any future defeat such as regression in worker's rights or environmental protections. Clinging to the tree that will never bear fruit with all the stubborn determination of a Japanese holdout.