cucumberman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 5,230
I've been on here for six years and I've never seen avatars
that's right we didn't. We had a who's who picture thread.
I've been on here for six years and I've never seen avatars
You've accused a member of belittling you for your post count when they pointed out that people might give your words a little more credence if you weren't so confrontational, I think you need to go back and read those posts again.
We did, but some of the ugly mugs on there fucked up my image driversthat's right we didn't. We had a who's who picture thread.
Well said 'El Presidente" /ironyAre the ones with high post counts moaning because they are worried they might be seen as nomarks.
on an internet forum
pmsl
Is this not just a pointless discussion as the decision has been made?
You might think differently if you posted in the main forum more frequently.I post here nearly everyday, just rarely post in the main forum, so dont get your point there.
What posters do i have a problem with? I pulled up Blueinsa because he bangs on about stuff i think should be left to the more than capable moderating team.
Me and Cheesy have both been Mods and seen stuff from the other side of the fence. Once you have done that how you look at things changes a little. I advocated post counts being disabled back in 2006 because of the reasons it has finally been done. A posters opinion should be valued whether they have one post or one trillion and if it ends the tedious pastime of calling people rags then this place will be all the better for it.
But as you dont care so much, support the actions as in my humble opinion they are the right thing to do.
Yep. It's infantile and idiotic.What it is, is utter shit. As Billy has already explained, he and others (including me) don't give a shit about our own post counts. If you want to pretend that we do in order to divert attention away from the real (and clearly stated over the course of the last 21 pages) reasons people would prefer to keep the post count visible, good luck to you. Classic straw man stuff......
You might think differently if you posted in the main forum more frequently.
If people are worried about people with high post counts feeling "special", why not have people's post counts up to 5,000 (so we can see if someone's brand new etc as stated) and then anyone with more just show 5,000+. I am personally not arsed about mine in the slightest, the only time I find out how many I have is when some unfunny **** refers to it and calls me a sad ****.
Yes, but looking at the posts that count, it appears that the decision has been made. Personally, I can't see why it makes a difference - as for getting stick for not having a high post count, man the fuck up and fight your corner.The thread's still open is it not?
And that wouldn't be time consuming at all when reading a meltdown thread after our first loss, in February.You do know you can see anybody's post count by clicking their name? - How does having that 5000 post rule thing help at all though? I thought the reason for 'hiding' the info was to ensure people don't prejudge a user's post in a certain way based on their number of posts. Which is idiotic.
I can't see a downside :/ We can all read, and in between the lines and everything.
Yes, but looking at the posts that count, it appears that the decision has been made. Personally, I can't see why it makes a difference - as for getting stick for not having a high post count, man the fuck up and fight your corner.
You do know you can see anybody's post count by clicking their name? - How does having that 5000 post rule thing help at all though? I thought the reason for 'hiding' the info was to ensure people don't prejudge a user's post in a certain way based on their number of posts. Which is idiotic.
I can't see a downside :/ We can all read, and in between the lines and everything.
And that wouldn't be time consuming at all when reading a meltdown thread after our first loss, in February.
There's not just me of that thinking. As I say, I have no interest at all in my post count, but while they aren't perfect, they are handy in the main forum to help detect WUMs and flappers. The idea of having a cut off is to counter claims from the brain dead that those in favour of post counts are in any way proud of the 'acheivment'
Says Mr. 5,762 posts.