Isn't it the quality of the posts rather than the number of posts that counts? Forgive me if this has already been suggested but I've seen elsewhere a system where people can commend or approve of a post thereby effectively rating the quality of the post.
For all those who are in favour of them being hidden, what difference does it make whether you can see them immediately or on another click of the mouse. Hiding them has done nothing iMO, and I for one would like to see them back
Means fuck all.Date joined
This does seem to happen a lot.Means fuck all.
You watch our first loss and all the rags come crawling out with 50 posts in 9 years since they joined.
Because people are perhaps only going to click on them to see when they have suspicions about a certain poster due to the content of their post rather than judging them from their post count before reading what they've actually posted. I think it may also give confidence to some with low post counts to contribute a bit more.
Yep and before it was easy to ignore by a quick look at join date and post count. I'll be tucked if I'm clicking on every **** on the Pellegrini out threadThis does seem to happen a lot.
That's my season ticket location ;)ha
if anyone is really that bothered then put your post count in your location like quiet_riot has done ;)
So ric wanted feedback, majority want them back, a few don't and now it's the same three or four people repeating their points.
If ric really wants feedback then we can do a poll, which Damocles doesn't want as he knows it will go the way he doesn't want.
So no point having feedback nor the thread as no one is changing anyone else's mind are they.