Post match | South China v City

[Anthony Kun]

Hate to say I told you so, but I've been singing Milner's praises for a long time. England's best wide player, our third best player last season and a player who has developed extremely well over the last two years. So many people have been saying "Navas is the savour, he'll provide width", but Milner gave us width last season and did a very good job, Navas will change nothing and believe me when I say this, Milner is a better player than Navas.

Milner could be DMR

Lol as if.

Navas is nothing but a weak Antonio Valencia.

Got to be a rag in disguise? And I dont call RAG on here - ever!

 

[Burtonblue]

Thought Fernandinho had a pretty good game. He will be hugely influential for us this season.
Sky commentary team must have been watching another game (again)
Negredo very promising too.
Happy overall.

 

[MJMRuiz]

Lescott didn't do anything wrong tbh. Just too poor on the ball for a Pellegrini side.

Milner could be DMR

Lol as if.

Navas is nothing but a weak Antonio Valencia.

Got to be a rag in disguise? And I dont call RAG on here - ever!

Try reading some of my posts you trash bag.<br /><br />-- Wed Jul 24, 2013 10:43 pm --<br /><br />What's all this Negredo hype about? A nice pass and an attempted bicycle kick. Anybody would think he'd just delivered a debut reminiscent of Aguero's or something.

 

[Anthony Kun]

Lescott didn't do anything wrong tbh. Just too poor on the ball for a Pellegrini side.

Lol as if.

Navas is nothing but a weak Antonio Valencia.

Got to be a rag in disguise? And I dont call RAG on here - ever!

Try reading some of my posts you trash bag.

-- Wed Jul 24, 2013 10:43 pm --

What's all this Negredo hype about? A nice pass and an attempted bicycle kick. Anybody would think he'd just delivered a debut reminiscent of Aguero's or something.

Just have - Full of negative condescending shit!

Edit/ Trash bag? Sound like a full on camp bloke about to hit me with his hand bag!!

 

[MJMRuiz]

It's not negative it's called analysis.

 

[MCFC BOB]

I think a lot of what MJM has to say is quite insightful and I agree with him 80% of the time, but there's an air about his posts that causes me dislike everything he says. He might know more about tactics than the rest of us but he's gone about explaining it in the most condescending and pompous way possible. He's probably more qualified than most of us to give his opinion on football because of his background, but referring to his past to constantly justify his opinions is pointless.

If he'd made a few insightful posts and then explained (when asked) why his posts are so detailed then people would have far more time for him. But he introduced himself as an academic and stuck his chest out - I'm not sure why he's surprised at the reaction he's had.

 

[johnmc]

Highlights coming up on sky sports one now if anyone is interested.

 

[bondsman]

Highlights coming up on sky sports one now if anyone is interested.

That will have been a tough editing job lol.

 

[Le Havre Oswald]

I think a lot of what MJM has to say is quite insightful and I agree with him 80% of the time, but there's an air about his posts that causes me dislike everything he says. He might know more about tactics than the rest of us but he's gone about explaining it in the most condescending and pompous way possible. He's probably more qualified than most of us to give his opinion on football because of his background, but referring to his past to constantly justify his opinions is pointless.

If he'd made a few insightful posts and then explained (when asked) why his posts are so detailed then people would have far more time for him. But he introduced himself as an academic and stuck his chest out - I'm not sure why he's surprised at the reaction he's had.

hahaha know he doesnt know more than the rest of us, he just thinks he does because hes deluded. Whats his back ground anyway, student of football ?

 

[Jumanji]

I think a lot of what MJM has to say is quite insightful and I agree with him 80% of the time, but there's an air about his posts that causes me dislike everything he says. He might know more about tactics than the rest of us but he's gone about explaining it in the most condescending and pompous way possible. He's probably more qualified than most of us to give his opinion on football because of his background, but referring to his past to constantly justify his opinions is pointless.

If he'd made a few insightful posts and then explained (when asked) why his posts are so detailed then people would have far more time for him. But he introduced himself as an academic and stuck his chest out - I'm not sure why he's surprised at the reaction he's had.

Fair assessment.

Good knowledge but lacking humility.

I don't know about the more qualified part though...