On the video the contact was in the box to use the freeze frame they did, from the wrong perspective, then it appears to be just outside the line however, if they did a freeze frame from the reverse perspective then the moment of contact was inside the lineHaving looked at it a few times I think VAR has to overturn it and they made the right decision.
Initial contact looks to be outside the box.
Fouls continuing into the box according to Law 12 have to be holding offences. He’s not held him, just impeded him so first contact is what matters for this type of foul.
Clear and obvious isn’t relevant here. It’s a line decision, has to be either inside or outside. Like offside it’s not considered subjective but binary. Tricky but looks more out than in so it’s pretty much the only decision he can come to.
The VAR official has just followed a simple process there and I can see why that’s the decision he had to make.
Because the Ref doesn't understand the rules.So VAR confirm its a foul, what I dont understand is that if it wasnt a penalty then surely it was denying a goal scoring opportunity and a yellow/red card ......but as far as i could see no punishment to the player for the foul, can anyone explain why ?
How can in one hand say, VAR has to overturn it and in the other, initial contact looks to be outside?Having looked at it a few times I think VAR has to overturn it and they made the right decision.
Initial contact looks to be outside the box.
Fouls continuing into the box according to Law 12 have to be holding offences. He’s not held him, just impeded him so first contact is what matters for this type of foul.
Clear and obvious isn’t relevant here. It’s a line decision, has to be either inside or outside. Like offside it’s not considered subjective but binary. Tricky but looks more out than in so it’s pretty much the only decision he can come to.
The VAR official has just followed a simple process there and I can see why that’s the decision he had to make.
They might actually play better in sandRags on the beach already
How can in one hand say, VAR has to overturn it and in the other, initial contact looks to be outside?
All I hear from the media is ten hag getting sacked and Southgate coming in. That’s comedy, not relevance.
The only sickening thing I hear about them now, not that I pay much attention, mind, is scruffy Jim being their saviour. That thoroughly fucks me off, but the counter is ago they’re recruiting.
They’re nothing.
Doesn’t do them any good in the football world though. They do get a lot of negative press now, whereas when purple head was there it was all positive.No it's relevance. It's keeping them on top of the clicks and generating interest. The rag hordes lap it up as they're still making the headlines. Even the negativity is generating hope. Somebody better coming in, Scruffy Jim sorting it out. Positive or negative they keep them the top headline the majority of the time.
Doesn't sound very clear and obvious!Having looked at it a few times