Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Not having a go but it makes me laugh when people say they would prefer both. Nobody is turning down both, so it’s a given.
No offence intended, you say "would take neither........end to the "quad", you do realise that winning either (or both), patently obviously ends all talk of a "quad", so on that basis, absolutely no reason to let either trophy go, we are quite capable of stopping them ourselves!At a push, would take neither if it meant Chelsea putting an end to the "Quad"!
Win the title and we'll prove that but sod it, lets win bothThis is a tough one.I just want we prove we are better team than Liverpool.
This is a tough one.I just want we prove we are better team than Liverpool.
It would also bring in a lot of sponsor money which allows us to buy better players and win the PL again. It’s a virtuous circle.purely to get the monkey off the back, CL this season.
I’ll tell you that here in Brazil that won’t be the case. They just want to see that we can do it at least once. And I’ll tell you that when we win it once, we’ll do it again and again. The first time is the hurdle. I want to see us win it before PSG doesThe immediate dipper response will be “Wait until you've won it six times, then come back and tell us you're great, la”. The immediate Chelsea response will be… the immediate United response will be… the immediate Forest response will be… (substitute appropriate number of times won). All and sundry – “You're having a laugh with us”.
And if ever we win it six times, it will be “You did it with dirty oil money, it doesn't count”.
You know that this is true.
As for the media, they will not acclaim us as a great side on that basis, because they have a vested interest in bigging up clubs that have millions of clicks from places like Kuala Lumpur, Lagos and San Diego that are so closely connected with Liverpool, Manchester, London. As Solozzo the “Turk” says in Godfather 1, “It's good business, Tom.”