Premier League Years 2013/14

Kun Aguero said:
For those complaining, which Liverpool goals would you have replaced with ours? Because I can't think of any.

I can't make my mind up what's happened here;

1) You've quoted bitoob, deleted his name and quote marks and then failed to reply

2) You've not read any of the past 4 pages of replies

3) You're trying to take the piss out of the fact he repeated and quoted himself three times but failing.

Whichever it is, the thread would be better off without your inane ramblings.
 
ManCityX said:
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
ManCityX said:
I take it Blue Is the Opposite of Blue supports Liverpool?

Bizarre how a non City fan would spend so much time here.
No no, I'm a Blue.

Hahahahahahahahahahahah

*deep breath*

Hahahahahahahahahahahah
I just want you to know that I'm really upset about this.

My mum's been trying to console me for the past 5 minutes but nothing has worked.

You've ruined my evening and my life.
 
de niro said:
ManCityX said:
I take it 'Blue Is the Opposite of Blue' is Pidginho?

no mate, just a teenage troll with fuck all else but to do come on here. he doesn't even believe what he types. he's just a needy fuck.

Brutal
 
de niro said:
ManCityX said:
I take it 'Blue Is the Opposite of Blue' is Pidginho?

no mate, just a teenage troll with fuck all else but to do come on here. he doesn't even believe what he types. he's just a needy fuck.
It's nice and warm here under your skin, Bill, you should try getting under here with me.
 
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
de niro said:
ManCityX said:
I take it 'Blue Is the Opposite of Blue' is Pidginho?

no mate, just a teenage troll with fuck all else but to do come on here. he doesn't even believe what he types. he's just a needy fuck.
It's nice and warm here under your skin, Bill, you should try getting under here with me.

I'm not getting under your skin, its way too dangerous to me.
 
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
karen7 said:
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
But reading opposing points of view is a good thing to do. Some articles are plain bitter, like that "match review" about our friendly against Dundee, but most of the articles about us which take a negative slant aren't bitter or rooted in bias. Some are totally fair. They don't always paint us in a good light, but we're not a perfect club. I'm yet to see any newspaper hit us hard in the way some of our own fans have about the horrendous ticket price increases for the Liverpool & Stoke games. It's good to read other perspectives even when you don't agree with them.

The daily mirror the last 6 days has had a double page rag section EVERY day,several one pages for chelsea and same for liverpool
Not a single word or even just the friendly scores about city except alf's injury
everyone else's friendlies have had a write up,explain that for me please
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-city-ease-4-1-friendly-3906338" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ly-3906338</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/live-sporting-kansas-city-v-3904151" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... -v-3904151</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/pre-season-friendlies-premier-league-2014-15-3787408" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... 15-3787408</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/watch-live-manchester-city-vs-3850798" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... vs-3850798</a>

And just for fun:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/manchester-united-fan-managed-define-3905313" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/m ... ne-3905313</a>

Haha, even the most incompetent troll would surely realise that you've fished them out from online, whereas Karen's point was that in the national newspaper that all the neutrals will read, we got much less coverage than the other teams. Picking out online articles as a justification for what's printed in a national newspaper, give me a fucking break.
 
Kun Aguero said:
For those complaining, which Liverpool goals would you have replaced with ours? Because I can't think of any.
Is this Irony? Hard to tell...

Having seen the Sky show I though Liverpool were clearly champions till the very last minute.

Anyway there were 102 City goals to chose from 156 if you include all the season's goals.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJSEsC0vens[/video]

47, 50 & 51 are pretty good...
68, 70 & 71 are mighty fine...
82, 124, 125 & 142 are very important...
As are 147, 149 & 149...
But best of all is probably 154.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.