So now we have the definition in English law, can we at least agree that (contrary to those who say it isn't racism) the courts might say it is, so there's enough justification to eject someone saying it, or even consider prosecution?argyle said:I think he could be asked to leave on grounds of acts in Public Order Act 1986 - part3: section 18 - prohibits, by its Part 3, expressions of racial hatred, which is defined as hatred against a group of persons by reason of the group's colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins.