Rags Thread

[leroy]

Re: General football/Manchester United forum

Pessimist.

I prefer to see it as 3rd, very close to second, and it being a great platform for next season

 

[Metal Biker]

Re: General football/Manchester United forum

Pessimist.

I prefer to see it as 3rd, very close to second, and it being a great platform for next season

Then you're deluding yourself.

Some people are never satisfied.

 

[Damocles]

Re: General football/Manchester United forum

I'm sick of the amount of bickering going on today, in the most childish manner. leroy, you'd probably do better if you stopped referring to City as "you".

 

[Pigeonho]

Re: General football/Manchester United forum

I'm sick of the amount of bickering going on today, in the most childish manner. leroy, you'd probably do better if you stopped referring to City as "you".

You should make those who argue do 1000 lines on 'The punishment forum'.
I never argue or disagree, so i'll never have the pleasure. ;-)

 

[Tomalonge]

Re: Rags Grind My Gears

Try this...nice and simple.. Glasgow and London are cities in Great Britain but london is England and glasgow is Scotland..

you try telling a glaswiegans that they're English ...Or a Londoner that hes Scottish..

Capiche.

You're comparing boroughs to countries? That's a little far fetched.

Right, have we finished with this crap now? I didn't just come on here to wind up everyone, y'know?

Yet you conveniently ignore my "state" comparison don't you. You know your "belief" to be incorrect but you still cling to it anyway....

United.....are.....not.....from.....or.....in.....Manchester.

State is also a bit far fetched. I was hoping you'd gather that.

United... are... called... Manchester... so... deal... with... it... child.<br /><br />-- Fri May 27, 2011 11:15 am --<br /><br />

So if a scots SPL team named themselves "Britain united",who would they be representing ?? the Scots premier league or the English premier league..take time to think about it ..

my argument is far from flawed..

Only one place on here called manchester :) everywhere else has its own name inc Trafford and Stretford. ta ra.

Scots SPL team called Britain United? Can you see why I'm having difficulties here? You're going way-the-fuck out to prove a point.

If they were called Britain United then they would have chosen to represent the United Kingdom, it's not rocket science. England = England, Britain = UK.

And does that mean Tameside isn't in Manchester? 'cause I've got more a few letters than disagree with you.

Besides, as I stated above, I didn't name the fucking team, I just support them, so deal with it.

 

[Tomalonge]

Re: Hypocracy by the rags?

Am I the only one who sees something a bit wrong with this??

<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1421929_video-manchester-united-stars-take-to-the-skies-to-feature-in-turkish-airlines-pre-flight-safety-film#comments" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... m#comments</a>

I hope so, I really hope you're the only one who's made that, quite ludicrous, assessment.

Just because we lost players due to an earlier crash? Is that a reason to not do airline safety commercials for a sponsor?

Let me guess, this would be under the category of "Still milking the Munich Disaster"?<br /><br />-- Fri May 27, 2011 11:23 am --<br /><br />

It's not like any of us would go out of our way to use that airline if paired against a Turkish club ! (unless they under-cut easyjet)

It's light hearted and no different to if our lot did one for Etihad with Balo doing the clownin serial offender skit etc, or Arsenal doing one for Emirates.

These sort of thangs will no doubt become much more common place takin clubs and sponsors to new heights. (excuse the pun)

yes, but if we had an airline disaster that made the mere mention of a certain City an offense warranting being removed from CoMS & the swamp well over 50 years later, as well as possibly being charged for inciting a riot, would we be making a light hearted comedic saftey video for an airline?

You'd hope so, really. Or should United just avoid planes altogether now?

 

[Pigeonho]

Re: Hypocracy by the rags?

Struggling to see anything hypocritical OP, could you explain it to me please, what you see as hypocrisy I mean.....

 

[Metal Biker]

Re: Rags Grind My Gears

State is also a bit far fetched. I was hoping you'd gather that.

United... are... called... Manchester... so... deal... with... it... child.

-- Fri May 27, 2011 11:15 am --

Besides, as I stated above, I didn't name the fucking team, I just support them, so deal with it.

Exactly, 'Manchester' in name only. That's all we've been trying to point out to you.

Would you have preferred if i stated that the Bronx is not actually New York City Or Queens is not a part of New York City itself, but a separate borough? Would that have made things easier to interpret? It's the assumption i'm pointing out here, and the more you refuse to accept this the more we have to use other examples for you to understand. Because you seem to be shouting down every comparison as being illogical only to the nature of it's size, but the concept is correct.

We're not validating your reason for supporting United, far as i'm concerned anyone can support whoever the hell they like, but your insistance that united are from Manchester, that Greater Manchester boroughs are a part of Manchester, is incorrect.

So....deal....with....it....child.

 

[Tomalonge]

Re: Rags Grind My Gears

State is also a bit far fetched. I was hoping you'd gather that.

United... are... called... Manchester... so... deal... with... it... child.

-- Fri May 27, 2011 11:15 am --

Besides, as I stated above, I didn't name the fucking team, I just support them, so deal with it.

Exactly, 'Manchester' in name only. That's all we've been trying to point out to you.

Would you have preferred if i stated that the Bronx is not actually New York City? Or Queens is not a part of New York City. Would that have made things easier to interpret? It's the assumption i'm pointing out here, and the more you refuse to accept this the more we have to use other examples for you to understand. Because you seem to be shouting down every comparison as being illogical only to the nature of it's size, but the concept is correct.

We're not validating your reason for supporting United, far as i'm concerned anyone can support whoever the hell they like, but your insistance that united are from Manchester, that Greater Manchester boroughs are a part of Manchester, is incorrect.

So....deal....with....it....child.

I can, quite easily. This all came from me saying I was a United fan. So, what am I dealing with? You being a nitpicking little shit again?

"waaaaah! it's called manchester but i don't think it's in manchester! waaaahfuckofffuckoffwaaah"

Get back in yer' fucking cot and get a grip. Even if I conceded you had a point, what would it achieve? You'll still be a ****. :)

 

[Metal Biker]

Re: Rags Grind My Gears

I can, quite easily.

What am I dealing with? You being a nitpicking little shit again?

"waaaaah! it's called manchester but i don't think it's in manchester!"

Get back in yer' fucking cot and get a grip. Even if I conceded you had a point, what would it achieve? You'll still be a ****. :)

Says the man who is quite obviously losing his temper, and at the same time the discussion.

Pick those toys up before you leave, again.