The interview was a sore one because City had defended him, backed him and Guardiola made him a much better player.I always supported Raheem when he was here, because I felt he'd been outrageously treated not only by the scousers, but by every other crowd in the country. Which left me nonplussed. And I was not particularly offended by his interview, frankly. Life's just too short. He wanted game time. He got it.
Very reluctantly, I am being forced to see that he was made to look quite a lot better than he actually is as a footballer by our superb midfield. He hasn't scored since August for Chelsea, apparently, barely had touches on the ball yesterday and gave it away more than any other player. After a brief honeymoon, Chelsea fans are starting to get on his case.
Ah well, Raz. At least you got some medals.
Correct.The interview was a sore one because City had defended him, backed him and Guardiola made him a much better player.
To throw that back at the club after all that’s happened was pure bitterness because of his misplaced ego.
Pundit on 5Live yesterday said on current form he'd be lucky to go to the World Cup.
You're on a wind up surley ?There are one or two posters on here - who do nothing but criticise Jack - some of his performances have been poor (granted) but nothing to fuel the hate from some posters on here.
You're on the wind up surley ?
You've just criticised Jack heavily on the Grealish thread ffs