BluessinceHydeRoad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 2,562
All transfers involve a risk, in part because there is no way of calculating "value for money". I have no idea of knowing what exactly you should be entitled to from a £49 million footballer, but I'm certain that it's far too early to say if we'll be satisfied or not. I remember as far back as 1966 when City splashed out an astronomical £40-odd thousand on a 19 year old Colin Bell, who, according to Big Mal "can't head it, can't pass it, he's hopeless." Everyone thought City were mad, but it was soon clear that Bell had been worth every penny and the deal looked better and better with every passing season. To-day, I think the powers at City know exactly what they want from Sterling. They will not be beguiled by a a classy wiggle of the hips, they won't drool over acceleration which destroys or even go into raptures over a goal of staggering individual brilliance. What City want is that Sterling be one of an eleven, one of a squad which gets the club the PL title back and makes us a power to be reckoned with in Europe. Sterling is part of a reconstruction which may cost £150 million or anything up to £200 million and involve players such as Pogba, de Bruyne et al, but City won't consider one player in isolation. It is the plan which matters, the overall cost. Only as the seasons pass will players' individual contributions be put under the microscope.