Not that it makes much difference at that kind of money, but I'm sure I read somewhere it was £71m. It was quoted as part of the investigation into Barca's recent transfer dealings.I may be a little high, however the general consensus at the time, and there's multiple newspaper/media articles saying similar, was that Liverpool sold Suarez for £75m. Given the Bale transfer fee, and the season Suarez had just had, I have no problem believing he'd cost Barca £75m.
We have moved on from mediocrity thank fuck
But you are making the ridiculous assumption the Bodgers is even remotely competentYou guys are really defensive. It was a question about youth development at your club and Pellegrini, and some of you have reacted like its the most insane question youve ever heard.
If your saying City doesnt have that problem, at all, definitely not, then I think youre turning a blind eye to it.
Heres another way of looking at it. At ages 20-23 , still immature , he would probably be better off under Rodgers and Wenger. When hes developed as a player, thats the time to be playing at City.
David Silva aged 20 moving to City would not have been as right as Silva aged 24 moving City.
Utter scunmy wankers who go to that extreme, just because a player wants to leave.
Apparently medical today, tomorrow deal announcement
Ta. Has an ITK said that?
BBCTa. Has an ITK said that?