There are no other fish as far as Sterling and his agent are concerned. They want City 100%.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum
- Thread starter Kippax.
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Hahaha, this is why I love watching scousers posting their deluded shite on here.
Do you know where they have got this from? Because Alexis Sanchez went to Arsenal and the Liverpool PR office couldn't think of anything else so pumped out numerous stories about how modern Northern clubs like Liverpool aren't as attractive as London clubs. Then there's fucking balloons can't see past the bullshit and in the best scouse traditions, pick up a dump truck and open their mouths and swallow it.
Love it when they come here, it always makes me giggle at how thick they all are
I have read some on here say that's the exact reason Hazard turned us down.
meeesh
Well-Known Member
Maybe he means Palace then ?
Universidad de Chile
Well-Known Member
+1Lets test Madrid with 35m for Isco instead.
All the way!!!!
With this 40m, we can get Isco, who is twice the player Sterling is, and knows Pelle too!
Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 32,282
Why is the word "derisory" only used when a football transfer offer is deemed unsatisfactory? This word apparently exists for no other reason. We never use it in day to day speak, but come transfer window time, everything is "derisory". Sorry, I notice pointless things, I know :)
dw7
Well-Known Member
Why offer so much if this lad can buy out his contract in December for around as little as £2m
I thought Liverpool wanted to keep him and wouldnt sell for less than £50m.I'm not sure what is so funny? He is a London lad and it has been no secret that he and his family would love to return to London. Look money talks but if he had a choice between City and one of the London clubs he would choose London in a shot. It is why City are having to bid so high to try and secure him as talk Arsenal/Chelsea were interested with Sterling wanting a move to Arsenal but the prohibitive price has meant City may be his only choice.
Are you suggesting they would let him go to Chelsea or Arsenal for less than the £40m we've offered.
Not just news management? Who knows.It has only just turned 10am in Boston which is where the money men will be deciding. I also think they probably want to see if any other fish jump in the pond if it looks like they are deliberating.
100% it will be rejected.
I'd be gutted if I were a Liverpool fan because you might get good money for Sterling, but you may not be able to replace him. Transfers are gambles. Markovic looked brilliant before you bought him, but turned out to be poor (I know he might come good yet). And Utd bough Di maria and he's got to be the biggest disappointment in Premiership history...eclipsing Carroll & CFC's Torres buy.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.