Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Danamy said:
bluechampion7891 said:

Jovetic or Dzeko I would think. Jovetic more likely due to his work rate and ball skills, Dzeko I doubt it but I did read about him as bait somewhere here before.

Can't think of anyone else who could be bait

Milner

that's out of our hands. he will leave for free (unless he signs a new deal)
 
Danamy said:
bluechampion7891 said:

Jovetic or Dzeko I would think. Jovetic more likely due to his work rate and ball skills, Dzeko I doubt it but I did read about him as bait somewhere here before.

Can't think of anyone else who could be bait

Milner
Not unless he signs a new deal
 
adrianr said:
Danamy said:
bluechampion7891 said:
Jovetic or Dzeko I would think. Jovetic more likely due to his work rate and ball skills, Dzeko I doubt it but I did read about him as bait somewhere here before.

Can't think of anyone else who could be bait

Milner

Are we just hoping they haven't noticed he's able to leave on a free?

They're thick as fuck they wont notice
 
barneylfc said:
It'll take at least £50m, perhaps more for an English rival. Think he'll stay for at least one more season. Doubt we'll take players in exchange.
City's players are fantastic (with one or two exceptions) but the team is rubbish

I'm not confident we'll finish above you. I think it depends a lot on our game against West Ham at the weekend. I've rated Sterling since he made his debut and would love to see him at City, but I can't really look beyond our results at the moment. Can't believe what's happening to us at the moment.
 
Damanino said:
30m bid will be made says the Mirror. (City-watch.)

Well sounds lot better than the 50m bid.

But 0% Pool would accept it.

Would be derisory and a waste of time.
 
Trying to engineer an exit?

When you consider we pay Sagna 150k a week to sit on the bench, I'd happily give Sterling the same just to add a bit of dynamism to the team.
 
Sleeping_Easy said:
Matt the Giant said:
Sleeping_Easy said:
Which is always a sure sign thats he's already had the offers and made his choice.

As was the BBC stunt.

Which was this?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/32143181" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/32143181</a>
 
barneylfc said:
It'll take at least £50m, perhaps more for an English rival. Think he'll stay for at least one more season. Doubt we'll take players in exchange.
sam-caddick said:
City Watch @City_Watch · 22m 22 minutes ago
Mirror: City will make a £30m bid for Liverpool ace Raheem Sterling (20) as soon as the transfer window opens.

City Watch @City_Watch · 4m 4 minutes ago
This is also being reported by the Mail who say City are confident of doing a deal for Sterling and would be open to using players as bait.
I told you £30 million.
 
Could YaYa be reunited with his brother again? They are going to need a midfielder who can't run very much anymore to replace Stevie G!
 
depps said:
Could YaYa be reunited with his brother again? They are going to need a midfielder who can't run very much anymore to replace Stevie G!

this crossed my mind. Yaya has the range of passing to play the role that stevie me played in 13-14

but i cant see liverpool paying Yaya's wages and I certainly cant see City sanctioning such a sale
 
malg said:
He's fucking overrated.

Thanks.

He's not overrated, he's a good player. He's the type of player that has the skillset to complement a good team, he's not a tevez type player that can singlehandedly drag a team on his own.
 
Sir Knives said:
malg said:
He's fucking overrated.

Thanks.

He's not overrated, he's a good player. He's the type of player that has the skillset to complement a good team, he's not a tevez type player that can singlehandedly drag a team on his own.
No, he's not being marketed by all and sundry as a 'good player', as they're quoting £30m plus (most say £50m). I'd agree that he is a good player........therefore I think he's massively overrated by the media, pundits and some on here.
 
ColinLee said:
barneylfc said:
It'll take at least £50m, perhaps more for an English rival. Think he'll stay for at least one more season. Doubt we'll take players in exchange.
sam-caddick said:
City Watch @City_Watch · 22m 22 minutes ago
Mirror: City will make a £30m bid for Liverpool ace Raheem Sterling (20) as soon as the transfer window opens.

City Watch @City_Watch · 4m 4 minutes ago
This is also being reported by the Mail who say City are confident of doing a deal for Sterling and would be open to using players as bait.
I told you £30 million.

There is NO WAY ON EARTH that Liverpool will accept a £30m offer for this guy when they do not want to sell in the first place ... I hate to remind everyone that Liverpool are only 4 pts behind us and with Pellegini looking absolutely clueless at the moment I myself am very worried that Liverpool may pinch the 4th spot which would mean virtually zero chance of him wanting to come to City anyway ...
 
Can only assume that the way he has gone from the saviour of the dippers / ingurland to crack head/druggie/lazy/greedy/overated player in the space of a fortnight within the rag/dipper media means the deal is already done and he's coming to us.
Obviously the negotiations were ongoing when all the ex-dippers were wheeled out in the press to say he should stay put and wasn't ready to move to another club. Now we have entered stage 2 - slagging him off and smearing his reputation, followed closely by quoting his transfer fee/wages as double the actual figure and an outcry over City 'ruining football'.
He wouldn't me my first choice tbh, but if it gets under the skin of this many cunts he's probably worth it just for shits and giggles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top