Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Silva_Spell said:
Would rather sign Coutinho
Over the past 2 seasons

Coutinho:
75 games
10 goals
11 assists (PL and CL only)
91 key passes (PL only)
80% pass completion (PL)
137 successful dribbles (PL)
80 fouls suffered (PL)
22 years old
Not homegrown

Sterling:
73 games
20 goals
12 assists (PL and CL only)
101 key passes (PL only)
81% pass completion (PL)
175 successful dribbles (PL)
134 fouls suffered (PL)
20 years old
Homegrown
 
Sterling is 20 years old and Barkley is 21. They both get far too much stick for me. Young players are unpredictable and go through bad patches. Sterling in particular has been brilliant for a 20 year old the last couple of seasons. The stats above tell that story. At the end of last season he as much as anyone was driving Liverpool to the title. If you buy a 20 year old unless you get Pele you cannot expect the complete article. Sterling, Barkley and Stones would all be great signings for City. All homegrown, all English and all three likely to grow together. Would rather sign Sterling for 30 million that say De Bruyne.
 
sam-caddick said:
Rorz88 said:
Marcos Lopes can definitely be as good as Raheem Sterling if not better and better yet, he would cost nothing !! Give him a chance next season and see him shine

Why not have both.

Lopes is a number ten and wants to play number ten, Sterling is a winger.

Lopes, Sterling and Kun, the pace!!!

Bale would cost the same as Sterling. I say go with Bale.
 
Sterling would be a fantastic signing for City.

I'd pay over £30m for him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.