Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Both clubs just need to get this sorted. If there's one thing I hate it's a transfer saga. If Liverpool sell him tonight for £45m they can go and buy Benteke tomorrow, everyone gets a full and happy pre season and all of this media storm can die down and fuck off. I can't deal with this for another few weeks.
 
'Breaking' on SSN:

City have contacted Slippers today about Raheem's situation.

Scoop of the Century that. FFS.

If that is breaking now on Sky it could actually be the start of the endgame. Liverpool insinuating that we cracked first, when in reality they did.
 
There will be players there who are too scared to befriend Sterling for fear of reprisals - toxic atmosphere that. Poor lad will know it too. It puts everybody in such a crap position.

Best for everyone involved to get this done and dusted.

Both clubs just need to get this sorted. If there's one thing I hate it's a transfer saga. If Liverpool sell him tonight for £45m they can go and buy Benteke tomorrow, everyone gets a full and happy pre season and all of this media storm can die down and fuck off. I can't deal with this for another few weeks.

Fully agree man
 
from your own quoted source:

2p - for any amount not exceeding 20p

1p - for any amount not exceeding 20p

end of

I'll explain why the debtor part is crucial:

No vendor is obliged to complete a transaction purely because you have the legal tender in your pocket. If you choose to sell you car, and I turn up at your house with the cash, you do not have to complete the transaction. If you spot me a sack of entirely legal tender, you still don't have to sell.
Once you agree to sell, and sign the deal, then I whip out my sack of legal tender, you cannot refuse. That's because I am now the debtor (due to the transaction being completed).
This is why there is specific reference to the debtor.
Technically it needs to be a court declared debt, but anybody taking you to court to recover debt would have to accept your bag of coins (subject to the amounts defined), so may as well have accepted the bag of coins without going to court.
The 1971 Coinage Act merely defines legal tender (which is contextual definition based on the number of coins involved), and the coinage specifications.
 
What it should actually read is we have already had contact, we've had the bid and we've took it.

They've been leaking all along.
 
I'll explain why the debtor part is crucial:

No vendor is obliged to complete a transaction purely because you have the legal tender in your pocket. If you choose to sell you car, and I turn up at your house with the cash, you do not have to complete the transaction. If you spot me a sack of entirely legal tender, you still don't have to sell.
Once you agree to sell, and sign the deal, then I whip out my sack of legal tender, you cannot refuse. That's because I am now the debtor (due to the transaction being completed).
This is why there is specific reference to the debtor.
Technically it needs to be a court declared debt, but anybody taking you to court to recover debt would have to accept your bag of coins (subject to the amounts defined), so may as well have accepted the bag of coins without going to court.
The 1971 Coinage Act merely defines legal tender (which is contextual definition based on the number of coins involved), and the coinage specifications.

Come on lads, hey. We're buying Sterling here and you two are clogging the topic up waffling on about bloody 2p's. :-)
 
Both clubs just need to get this sorted. If there's one thing I hate it's a transfer saga. If Liverpool sell him tonight for £45m they can go and buy Benteke tomorrow, everyone gets a full and happy pre season and all of this media storm can die down and fuck off. I can't deal with this for another few weeks.
And Liverpool will be thinking If City offer us £50m tonight, they can have the player they want for a price they can afford and we can buy Benteke.

There's so long left in the window, I can't see Liverpool dropping their asking price for at least a month.
 
You mention that Sterling has lost the PR war, well if you think Liverpool have gone about their business in the correct manner then you really are a deluded bunch.You have had every Tom ,dick and mickey ridiculing Sterling and using the istree, Shankly turning in his grave etc excuse to put pressure on the lad.
The lad doesn't want to play for your manager and he can see that by coming to Manchester City he will have a better chance of winning silverware.
Players do not sign for Liverpool for your history ( them days are long gone). It's your PR machine that makes them say that.

I mentioned it in relation to it being a fact rather than saying that I agreed with it - there’s no question that there has been a PR war and that he’s lost it. Somewhere along the way, then he may well have received some slightly unhelpful advice from his agent. I’m not sure.

At the same time, why would I believe everything (anything?) that comes out from the club? Modern day football is big fucking business – and arguably the football aspect is just a sideshow in many respects. Whilst I still follow the sideshow, I don’t support the business.

For example, Roy Hodgson once informed the national press that Mascherano had refused to play against City just days before he left for Barcelona. It has since been strongly suggested that this infact a lie. Football had become completely irrelevant at Liverpool at that time - particularly given we had Roy fucking Hodgson as manager - and it’s now thought he was left out to protect the ‘investment’ (to avoid injury) as there was a real danger that Liverpool would go into administration – especially without the sale going through. People believed what they heard / were told though.

This isn’t unique to Liverpool, by the way. All clubs drip feed the media with certain information that they want to put out into the public domain. It’s exactly the same with agents.

At the end of the day, I don’t actually have a clue what’s true and what isn’t in any of this – be that from Liverpool’s, City’s, Raheem Sterling’s, Aidy Ward’s or whoever’s perspective.

45 million would suit all parties though here, I think. Might as well get it done (and we can then go and try and get a forward in).

Up the Reds!
 
And Liverpool will be thinking If City offer us £50m tonight, they can have the player they want for a price they can afford and we can buy Benteke.

There's so long left in the window, I can't see Liverpool dropping their asking price for at least a month.

Rodgers will not want Sterling around the squad all that time, slagging off the club, its owners and its manager to all their prize assets. That's why there is pressure on them.
 
And Liverpool will be thinking If City offer us £50m tonight, they can have the player they want for a price they can afford and we can buy Benteke.

There's so long left in the window, I can't see Liverpool dropping their asking price for at least a month.
Is in worth £5m to have a toxic dressing room for the full pre season, a tour with this media storm hanging over it, where every press conference will be overshadowed by this situation. It's just absurd. If they keep him for another month it will just derail Liverpool's season.
 
Those scousers eh....
CJjQ8gqUAAAJL0Z.jpg
 
I mentioned it in relation to it being a fact rather than saying that I agreed with it - there’s no question that there has been a PR war and that he’s lost it. Somewhere along the way, then he may well have received some slightly unhelpful advice from his agent. I’m not sure.

At the same time, why would I believe everything (anything?) that comes out from the club? Modern day football is big fucking business – and arguably the football aspect is just a sideshow in many respects. Whilst I still follow the sideshow, I don’t support the business.

For example, Roy Hodgson once informed the national press that Mascherano had refused to play against City just days before he left for Barcelona. It has since been strongly suggested that this infact a lie. Football had become completely irrelevant at Liverpool at that time - particularly given we had Roy fucking Hodgson as manager - and it’s now thought he was left out to protect the ‘investment’ (to avoid injury) as there was a real danger that Liverpool would go into administration – especially without the sale going through. People believed what they heard / were told though.

This isn’t unique to Liverpool, by the way. All clubs drip feed the media with certain information that they want to put out into the public domain. It’s exactly the same with agents.

At the end of the day, I don’t actually have a clue what’s true and what isn’t in any of this – be that from Liverpool’s, City’s, Raheem Sterling’s, Aidy Ward’s or whoever’s perspective.

45 million would suit all parties though here, I think. Might as well get it done (and we can then go and try and get a forward in).

Up the Reds!

Pretty reasonable outlook and fully agree with just getting this over and done with but its Liverpool's valuation which is a bit OTT. £40 million up front I think it'll end up being, which is more than enough in my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top