A section of City fans have regularly needed a scapegoat down through the years. Remember the abuse Richard Edghill got? Why should now be any different?I know I shouldn’t be, but I am staggered at some of the comments on here. After the years of contribution he has made to our success just seems odd.
Isn’t that Grealish’s job now ?A section of City fans have regularly needed a scapegoat down through the years. Remember the abuse Richard Edghill got? Why should now be any different?
True, But you could chuck in Mahrez and Sterling in there as well. Some of our fans don't deserve the team. Yes; criticise players if you want. But constructive criticism, not needless abuse. Which serves no purpose.Isn’t that Grealish’s job now ?
I’d rather have Bernardo and in a year or so at least one of Grealish and Foden in the middle. Plus we still aren’t sure whar Bernardo wants to do. So keeping Sterling helps us as he can play either side.I'm in two minds about Sterling, and it's fair to say that he splits opinion more than any other City player.
Not dissimilar to Rashford he seems to enjoy these little purple patches before missing an open goal and then drifting into self pity,
Personally I'd rather have Mahrez, Foden, Bernardo or Grealish on the wings as they don't lose the ball in daft positions, and leave us exposed to counter attacks.
However, that doesn't mean that I think we should sell Sterling. On the contrary he provides an option for certain situations, and that's how you win the PL
One of the biggest disgraces from a section of City fans, abusing one of their own.A section of City fans have regularly needed a scapegoat down through the years. Remember the abuse Richard Edghill got? Why should now be any different?